Back to Search Start Over

Patient- and Physician-Level Factors Associated With Adherence to C-CHANGE Recommendations in Primary Care Settings in Ontario.

Authors :
Lee TM
Tobe SW
Butt DA
Ivers NM
Gershon AS
Barnsley J
Liu PP
Jaakkimainen L
Walker KM
Tu K
Source :
CJC open [CJC Open] 2020 Jul 17; Vol. 2 (6), pp. 563-576. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 17 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: We previously found large variation among family physicians in adherence to the C anadian C ardiovascular H armonization of N ational G uidelines E ndeavour (C-CHANGE). We assessed the role of patient- and physician-level factors in the variation in adherence to recommendations for managing cardiovascular disease risk factors.<br />Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using multilevel logistic regression analyses with the E lectronic M edical R ecord A dministrative data L inked D atabase (EMRALD) housed at ICES in Ontario. Five quality indicators based on C-CHANGE guidelines were modelled. Effects of clustering and between-group variation, patient-level (sociodemographics, comorbidities) and physician-level characteristics (demographic and practice information) were assessed to determine odds ratios of receiving C-CHANGE recommended care.<br />Results: In all, 324 Ontario physicians practicing in 41 clinics who provided care to 227,999 adult patients were studied. We found significant variation in quality indicators, with 15% to 39% of the total variation attributable to nonpatient factors. The largest variation was in performing 2-hour plasma glucose testing in prediabetic patients. Patient-level factors most frequently associated with recommendation adherence included sex, age, and multi-comorbidities. Women were more likely than men to have their body mass index measured, and their blood pressure controlled, but less likely to receive antiplatelet medications and liver-enzyme testing if overweight or obese.<br />Conclusions: The majority of variations in adherence were attributable to patient attributes, but a substantial proportion of unexplained variation was due to differences among physicians and clinics. This finding may signal suboptimal processes or structures and warrant further investigation to improve the quality of primary care management of cardiovascular disease in Ontario.<br /> (© 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2589-790X
Volume :
2
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
CJC open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33305217
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.07.007