Back to Search Start Over

Measuring change in health-related quality of life: the impact of different analytical methods on the interpretation of treatment effects in glioma patients.

Authors :
Coomans MB
Taphoorn MJB
Aaronson NK
Baumert BG
van den Bent M
Bottomley A
Brandes AA
Chinot O
Coens C
Gorlia T
Herrlinger U
Keime-Guibert F
Malmström A
Martinelli F
Stupp R
Talacchi A
Weller M
Wick W
Reijneveld JC
Dirven L
Source :
Neuro-oncology practice [Neurooncol Pract] 2020 Jun 07; Vol. 7 (6), pp. 668-675. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 07 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Different analytical methods may lead to different conclusions about the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to examine 3 different methods to evaluate change in HRQoL and to study whether these methods result in different conclusions.<br />Methods: HRQoL data from 15 randomized clinical trials were combined (CODAGLIO project). Change in HRQoL scores, measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and BN20 questionnaires, was analyzed in 3 ways: (1) at the group level, comparing mean changes in scale/item scores between treatment arms, (2) at the patient level per scale/item, calculating the percentage of patients that deteriorated, improved, or remained stable per scale/item, and (3) at the individual patient level, combining all scales/items.<br />Results: Baseline and first follow-up HRQoL data were available for 3727 patients. At the group scale/item level, only the item "hair loss" showed a significant and clinically relevant change (ie, ≥10 points) over time, whereas change scores on the other scales/items were statistically significant only (all P  < .001; range in change score, 0.1-6.2). Although a large proportion of patients had stable HRQoL over time (range, 27%-84%) on the patient level per scale/item, many patients deteriorated (range, 6%-43%) or improved (range, 8%-32%) on a specific scale/item. At the individual patient level, the majority of patients (86%) showed both deterioration and improvement, whereas only 1% remained stable on all scales.<br />Conclusions: Different analytical methods of changes in HRQoL result in distinct conclusions of treatment effects, all of which may be relevant for informing clinical decision making.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2054-2577
Volume :
7
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neuro-oncology practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33304601
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa033