Sex- and injury-based differences in knee biomechanics in mouse models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Sex and joint injury are risk factors implicated in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). In mouse models of post-traumatic OA (ptOA), the pathogenesis of disease is notably impacted by sex (often worse in males) and injury model (e.g. meniscal versus ligament injury). Increasing ptOA progression and severity is often associated with greater relative instability of the joint but few studies have directly quantified changes in joint mechanics after injury and compared outcomes across multiple models in both male and female mice. Passive anterior-posterior knee biomechanics were evaluated in 10-week-old, male and female C57BL/6J mice. PtOA injury models included destabilisation of the medial meniscus (DMM), anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) or mechanical rupture (ACLR), and combined DMM and ACLT (DMM + ACLT). Sham operated and non-operated controls (NOC) were included for baseline comparisons. The test apparatus loaded hindlimbs at 60° flexion between ± 1 N at 0.5 mm/s (build specifications available for download: https://doi.org/10.17632/z754455x3c.1). Measures of joint laxity (range of motion, neutral zone) and stiffness were calculated. Joint laxity was comparable between male and female mice while joint stiffness was greater in females (P ≤ 0.002, correcting for body-mass and injury-model). Anterior-posterior joint mechanics were minimally altered by DMM but significantly affected by loss of the ACL (P < 0.001), with equivalent changes between ACL-injury models despite different injury mechanisms and adjacent meniscal damage. These findings suggest that despite the important role of joint injury; sex- and model-specific differences in ptOA progression and severity are not primarily driven by altered anterior-posterior knee biomechanics.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)