Back to Search Start Over

Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards interlaboratory study on intensity calibration for x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy instruments using low-density polyethylene.

Authors :
Reed BP
Cant DJH
Spencer SJ
Carmona-Carmona AJ
Bushell A
Herrera-Gómez A
Kurokawa A
Thissen A
Thomas AG
Britton AJ
Bernasik A
Fuchs A
Baddorf AP
Bock B
Theilacker B
Cheng B
Castner DG
Morgan DJ
Valley D
Willneff EA
Smith EF
Nolot E
Xie F
Zorn G
Smith GC
Yasufuku H
Fenton JL
Chen J
Counsell JDP
Radnik J
Gaskell KJ
Artyushkova K
Yang L
Zhang L
Eguchi M
Walker M
Hajdyła M
Marzec MM
Linford MR
Kubota N
Cortazar-Martínez O
Dietrich P
Satoh R
Schroeder SLM
Avval TG
Nagatomi T
Fernandez V
Lake W
Azuma Y
Yoshikawa Y
Shard AG
Source :
Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society [J Vac Sci Technol A] 2020 Dec; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 063208. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 23.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We report the results of a Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards interlaboratory study on the intensity scale calibration of x-ray photoelectron spectrometers using low-density polyethylene (LDPE) as an alternative material to gold, silver, and copper. An improved set of LDPE reference spectra, corrected for different instrument geometries using a quartz-monochromated Al Kα x-ray source, was developed using data provided by participants in this study. Using these new reference spectra, a transmission function was calculated for each dataset that participants provided. When compared to a similar calibration procedure using the NPL reference spectra for gold, the LDPE intensity calibration method achieves an absolute offset of ∼3.0% and a systematic deviation of ±6.5% on average across all participants. For spectra recorded at high pass energies (≥90 eV), values of absolute offset and systematic deviation are ∼5.8% and ±5.7%, respectively, whereas for spectra collected at lower pass energies (<90 eV), values of absolute offset and systematic deviation are ∼4.9% and ±8.8%, respectively; low pass energy spectra perform worse than the global average, in terms of systematic deviations, due to diminished count rates and signal-to-noise ratio. Differences in absolute offset are attributed to the surface roughness of the LDPE induced by sample preparation. We further assess the usability of LDPE as a secondary reference material and comment on its performance in the presence of issues such as variable dark noise, x-ray warm up times, inaccuracy at low count rates, and underlying spectrometer problems. In response to participant feedback and the results of the study, we provide an updated LDPE intensity calibration protocol to address the issues highlighted in the interlaboratory study. We also comment on the lack of implementation of a consistent and traceable intensity calibration method across the community of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) users and, therefore, propose a route to achieving this with the assistance of instrument manufacturers, metrology laboratories, and experts leading to an international standard for XPS intensity scale calibration.<br /> (© 2020 Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0734-2101
Volume :
38
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33281279
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0000577