Back to Search
Start Over
Nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction after areola-sparing mastectomy.
- Source :
-
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS [J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg] 2021 Jun; Vol. 74 (6), pp. 1223-1228. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 09. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Introduction: The number of patients requesting prophylactic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is rising. The oncological safety of techniques preserving the nipple and/or areola complex is still controversial. Nevertheless, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM) are becoming increasingly popular. After ASM, traditional nipple reconstruction techniques can be a disappointment and can lead to a deep groove around the new nipple. We describe a technique to overcome these issues and analyzed how three types of mastectomy (skin-sparing mastectomy or SSM, ASM, and NSM) compare to one another by looking into the number of wound infections, extra procedures for the loss of projection, nipple necrosis, and BREAST-Q scores.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 467 breast reconstructions performed in 351 patients between 2011 and 2017 at the University Hospital of Gent. Patients were asked to fill out the BREAST-Q questionnaire and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed and correlated to demographic information.<br />Results: Patients undergoing a nipple reconstruction after ASM are experiencing similar rates of wound problems, extra surgical procedures for the loss of projection and necrosis, compared to women with a history of SSM. When considering the "satisfaction with breast" and "satisfaction with outcome" modules of the BREAST-Q, we noted that nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) patients report lower scores than SSM and ASM patients and ASM patients seem to report a higher "satisfaction with nipple," than the other two treatment groups.<br />Conclusion: An ASM is a valuable alternative to a nipple-sparing mastectomy and leads to a good esthetic result and patient satisfaction.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.<br /> (Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Esthetics
Female
Humans
Microsurgery methods
Middle Aged
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Retrospective Studies
Breast Neoplasms surgery
Mammaplasty adverse effects
Mammaplasty methods
Mastectomy adverse effects
Mastectomy methods
Nipples surgery
Organ Sparing Treatments methods
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications prevention & control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1878-0539
- Volume :
- 74
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33279428
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.082