Back to Search Start Over

Nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction after areola-sparing mastectomy.

Authors :
Opsomer D
Vyncke T
Depypere B
Stillaert F
Van Landuyt K
Blondeel P
Source :
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS [J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg] 2021 Jun; Vol. 74 (6), pp. 1223-1228. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 09.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: The number of patients requesting prophylactic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is rising. The oncological safety of techniques preserving the nipple and/or areola complex is still controversial. Nevertheless, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM) are becoming increasingly popular. After ASM, traditional nipple reconstruction techniques can be a disappointment and can lead to a deep groove around the new nipple. We describe a technique to overcome these issues and analyzed how three types of mastectomy (skin-sparing mastectomy or SSM, ASM, and NSM) compare to one another by looking into the number of wound infections, extra procedures for the loss of projection, nipple necrosis, and BREAST-Q scores.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 467 breast reconstructions performed in 351 patients between 2011 and 2017 at the University Hospital of Gent. Patients were asked to fill out the BREAST-Q questionnaire and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed and correlated to demographic information.<br />Results: Patients undergoing a nipple reconstruction after ASM are experiencing similar rates of wound problems, extra surgical procedures for the loss of projection and necrosis, compared to women with a history of SSM. When considering the "satisfaction with breast" and "satisfaction with outcome" modules of the BREAST-Q, we noted that nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) patients report lower scores than SSM and ASM patients and ASM patients seem to report a higher "satisfaction with nipple," than the other two treatment groups.<br />Conclusion: An ASM is a valuable alternative to a nipple-sparing mastectomy and leads to a good esthetic result and patient satisfaction.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.<br /> (Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-0539
Volume :
74
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33279428
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.082