Back to Search Start Over

A Model for Exploring Compatibility Between Applicants and Residency Programs: Right Resident, Right Program.

Authors :
Winkel AF
Morgan HK
Burk-Rafel J
Dalrymple JL
Chiang S
Marzano D
Major C
Katz NT
Ollendorff AT
Hammoud MM
Source :
Obstetrics and gynecology [Obstet Gynecol] 2021 Jan 01; Vol. 137 (1), pp. 164-169.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Holistic review of residency applications is touted as the gold standard for selection, yet vast application numbers leave programs reliant on screening using filters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores that do not reliably predict resident performance and may threaten diversity. Applicants struggle to identify which programs to apply to, and devote attention to these processes throughout most of the fourth year, distracting from their clinical education. In this perspective, educators across the undergraduate and graduate medical education continuum propose new models for student-program compatibility based on design thinking sessions with stakeholders in obstetrics and gynecology education from a broad range of training environments. First, we describe a framework for applicant-program compatibility based on applicant priorities and program offerings, including clinical training, academic training, practice setting, residency culture, personal life, and professional goals. Second, a conceptual model for applicant screening based on metrics, experiences, attributes, and alignment with program priorities is presented that might facilitate holistic review. We call for design and validation of novel metrics, such as situational judgment tests for professionalism. Together, these steps could improve the transparency, efficiency and fidelity of the residency application process. The models presented can be adapted to the priorities and values of other specialties.<br />Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure John L. Dalrymple disclosed that he is on the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Board of Directors. David Marzano disclosed that he has served on the ACOG Simulation Working Group, APGO Board of Directors, and the APGO Testing and Assessment Committee, and received reimbursement for travel for all three activities. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-233X
Volume :
137
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Obstetrics and gynecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33278296
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004179