Back to Search Start Over

Humeral stress shielding following cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction: An under-reported complication?

Authors :
Braig ZV
Tagliero AJ
Rose PS
Elhassan BT
Barlow JD
Wagner ER
Sanchez-Sotelo J
Houdek MT
Source :
Journal of surgical oncology [J Surg Oncol] 2021 Feb; Vol. 123 (2), pp. 505-509. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 01.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: The proximal humerus is a common location for primary and non-primary tumors. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus is commonly performed with an endoprosthesis with low rates of structural failure. The incidence and risk factors for stress shielding are under reported.<br />Methods: Thirty-nine (19 male, 20 female) patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus and reconstruction with a cemented modular endoprosthesis between 2000 and 2018. The mean resection length was 12 ± 4 cm and was most commonly performed for metastatic disease (n = 26, 67%).<br />Results: Stress shielding was observed in 9 (23%) patients at a mean of 29 (6-132) months postoperatively. Patients with stress shielding were noted to have shorter intramedullary stem length (87 vs. 107 mm, p < .001), longer extramedullary implant length (16 vs. 14 cm, p = .01) and a higher extramedullary implant to stem length ratio (2.1 vs. 1.1, p < .001). The incidence of stress shielding was higher (p = .003) in patients reconstructed with 75 mm stem (n = 6, 67%) lengths.<br />Conclusion: Stress shielding of the humerus was associated with the use of shorter stems and long extramedullary implants. The long-term ramifications of stress shielding on implant stability, complications at the time of revision surgery, and overall patient outcomes remain unknown.<br /> (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-9098
Volume :
123
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33259663
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26300