Back to Search
Start Over
Multi-center nationwide comparison of seven serology assays reveals a SARS-CoV-2 non-responding seronegative subpopulation.
- Source :
-
EClinicalMedicine [EClinicalMedicine] 2020 Dec; Vol. 29, pp. 100651. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 19. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: An Israeli national taskforce performed a multi-center clinical and analytical validation of seven serology assays to determine their utility and limitations for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.<br />Methods: Serology assays from Roche, Abbott, Diasorin, BioMerieux, Beckman-Coulter, Siemens, and an in-house RBD ELISA were included. Negative samples from 2391 individuals representative of the Israeli population, and 698 SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients, collected between March and May 2020, were analyzed.<br />Findings: Immunoassays sensitivities between 81.5%-89.4% and specificities between 97.7%-100% resulted in a profound impact on the expected Positive Predictive Value (PPV) in low (<15%) prevalence scenarios. No meaningful increase was detected in the false positive rate in children compared to adults. A positive correlation between disease severity and antibody titers, and no decrease in antibody titers in the first 8 weeks after PCR positivity was observed. We identified a subgroup of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (~5% of patients), who remained seronegative across a wide range of antigens, isotypes, and technologies.<br />Interpretation: The commercially available automated immunoassays exhibit significant differences in performance and expected PPV in low prevalence scenarios. The low false-positivity rate in under 20's suggests that cross-reactive immunity from previous CoV strains is unlikely to explain the milder disease course in children. Finding no decrease in antibody titers in the first 8 weeks is in contrast to some reports of short half-life for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The ~5% who were seronegative non-responders, using multiple assays in a population-wide manner, represents the proportion of patients that may be at risk for re-infection.<br />Funding: Israel Ministry of Health.<br />Competing Interests: YL is supported by the Nehemia Rubin Excellence in Biomedical Research – The TELEM Program of Chaim Sheba Medical Center. All other authors have nothing to declare.<br /> (© 2020 The Authors.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2589-5370
- Volume :
- 29
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- EClinicalMedicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33235985
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100651