[Seasonal Chemical Composition Characteristics and Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in Zhengzhou].

The aim of this study was to fully understand the pollution characteristics and sources of PM _2.5 in Zhengzhou, and to investigate the differences in four seasons and between urban and suburban areas. At the Zhengzhou environmental monitoring center (urban areas) and Zhengzhou University (suburban areas), 1284 environmental PM _2.5 samples were collected in the four seasons of 2018. The concentrations of nine kinds of inorganic water-soluble ions, organic carbon, elemental carbon and 27 kinds of elements, were measured by ion chromatography, carbon analyzer, and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, respectively. Enrichment factors (EF), index of geoaccumulation ( I _geo ), potential ecological risk index (RI), chemical mass balance model (CMB), backward trajectory, and potential source contribution function were the methods used to study the chemical component characteristics and source differences of PM _2.5 in different seasons in the urban and suburban areas of Zhengzhou. The results showed that the annual average PM _2.5 concentration at the Zhengzhou environmental monitoring center and Zhengzhou University sites reached (59.7±24.0) μg·m ^-3 and (74.7±13.5) μg·m ^-3 , respectively. The PM _2.5 concentration at the suburban point was higher than at the urban point with the exception of winter, and the seasonal mean concentration decreased in the order of winter > autumn > spring > summer. Compared with the urban areas, the suburban areas were more affected by crustal substances in spring, and the concentrations of all components were higher in summer and autumn than the urban areas. Nevertheless, urban areas were more affected by coal burning sources and motor vehicle sources in winter. The component analysis results showed that the influences of soil dust and building dust were greater in the suburbs in spring than in the urban areas. In autumn, the suburbs were more affected by biomass sources than the urban areas, while the urban areas were more affected by building dust than were the suburbs. The concentrations of Cu, As, Zn, Pb, and Sb were strongly influenced by anthropogenic sources, and the enrichments of Zn, Cu, As, and Pb in urban areas were greater than in the suburbs. In addition, Zn, Cu, As, and Pb exhibited potential ecological risks. The outcomes of the CMB model showed that dust sources, secondary sulfate, secondary nitrate, and coal burning sources contributed significantly to PM _2.5 concentrations in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. The contributions of secondary pollution sources (secondary organic aerosol, secondary sulfate, and secondary nitrate) and motor vehicle sources to urban areas were higher than to suburban areas, and the influences of biomass sources in autumn and winter were significantly higher than in spring and summer and urban areas. The backward trajectory results indicated that the local PM _2.5 concentration was affected by distant transmission from the northwest except in summer, was affected by neighboring provinces in the east in four seasons, and was affected by transmission from the south, with the exception of winter. Furthermore, the consequences of potential sources demonstrated that the local PM _2.5 concentration was mainly affected by the potential areas in Henan province and its boundary with neighboring provinces.