Back to Search
Start Over
Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement with the Perceval S and Intuity Elite.
- Source :
-
The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon [Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2021 Aug; Vol. 69 (5), pp. 412-419. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 25. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) has emerged as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement. This single-center study retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of the Perceval S (LivaNova) and Intuity Elite (Edwards LifeSciences) rapid deployment valves (RDVs) in a propensity score matched patient cohort.<br />Methods: A total of 372 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent RDAVR between 2012 and 2018 at our institution. The Intuity Elite (INT group) and Perceval S (PER group) were implanted in 251 and 121 patients, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching for relevant preoperative comorbidities, 107 patient pairs were compared with respect to relevant perioperative data including hemodynamic parameter, postoperative pacemaker implantation, and 30-day all-cause mortality.<br />Results: Propensity score matching resulted in balanced characteristics between groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time did not differ between groups, but more patients in the INT group received coronary artery bypass grafting compared with the PER group (56 vs. 42%; p = 0.055). Thirty-day mortality (4.7 vs. 2.2%) and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (7 versus 4.4%) were comparable between the INT and PER groups for isolated AVR and also for combined procedures, respectively. Cerebrovascular events showed comparable low rates for both RDVs (INT group [1.9%] vs. PER group [2.8%]). Indexed effective orifice area was higher in the INT group (0.90 vs. 0.82 cm <superscript>2</superscript> /m <superscript>2</superscript> ) and coupled to a lower peak (17 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 8) and mean (10 ± 5 vs. 12 ± 4) pressure gradients compared with the PER group.<br />Conclusions: Our propensity score analysis in AVR patients showed good hemodynamic characteristics with comparable 30-day mortality rate and complications rates for both investigated RDVs.<br />Competing Interests: None declared.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Postoperative Complications etiology
Prosthesis Design
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Operative Time
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1439-1902
- Volume :
- 69
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33099764
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716892