Back to Search Start Over

Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement with the Perceval S and Intuity Elite.

Authors :
Liakopoulos OJ
Gerfer S
Rahmanian P
Eghbalzadeh K
Djordjevic I
Schlachtenberger G
Zeriouh M
Mader N
Choi YH
Wahlers T
Source :
The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon [Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2021 Aug; Vol. 69 (5), pp. 412-419. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 25.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background:  Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) has emerged as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement. This single-center study retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and hemodynamic performance of the Perceval S (LivaNova) and Intuity Elite (Edwards LifeSciences) rapid deployment valves (RDVs) in a propensity score matched patient cohort.<br />Methods:  A total of 372 consecutive patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent RDAVR between 2012 and 2018 at our institution. The Intuity Elite (INT group) and Perceval S (PER group) were implanted in 251 and 121 patients, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching for relevant preoperative comorbidities, 107 patient pairs were compared with respect to relevant perioperative data including hemodynamic parameter, postoperative pacemaker implantation, and 30-day all-cause mortality.<br />Results:  Propensity score matching resulted in balanced characteristics between groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time did not differ between groups, but more patients in the INT group received coronary artery bypass grafting compared with the PER group (56 vs. 42%; p  = 0.055). Thirty-day mortality (4.7 vs. 2.2%) and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (7 versus 4.4%) were comparable between the INT and PER groups for isolated AVR and also for combined procedures, respectively. Cerebrovascular events showed comparable low rates for both RDVs (INT group [1.9%] vs. PER group [2.8%]). Indexed effective orifice area was higher in the INT group (0.90 vs. 0.82 cm <superscript>2</superscript> /m <superscript>2</superscript> ) and coupled to a lower peak (17 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 8) and mean (10 ± 5 vs. 12 ± 4) pressure gradients compared with the PER group.<br />Conclusions:  Our propensity score analysis in AVR patients showed good hemodynamic characteristics with comparable 30-day mortality rate and complications rates for both investigated RDVs.<br />Competing Interests: None declared.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1439-1902
Volume :
69
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33099764
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716892