Back to Search Start Over

Systemic treatments in the management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Siegels D
Heratizadeh A
Abraham S
Binnmyr J
Brockow K
Irvine AD
Halken S
Mortz CG
Flohr C
Schmid-Grendelmeier P
Van der Poel LA
Muraro A
Weidinger S
Werfel T
Schmitt J
Source :
Allergy [Allergy] 2021 Apr; Vol. 76 (4), pp. 1053-1076. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 04.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: As an evidence resource for the currently planned European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) clinical practice guideline "systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD)," we critically appraised evidence on systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.<br />Methods: We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for AD up to February 2020. Primary efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, AD symptoms and health-related quality of life. Primary safety outcomes included cumulative incidence rates for (serious) adverse events. Trial quality was assessed applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate.<br />Results: 50 RCTs totalling 6681 patients were included. Trial evidence was identified for apremilast, azathioprine (AZA), baricitinib, ciclosporin A (CSA), corticosteroids, dupilumab, interferon-gamma, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), mepolizumab, methotrexate (MTX), omalizumab, upadacitinib and ustekinumab. Meta-analyses were indicated for the efficacy of baricitinib [EASI75 RD 0.16, 95% CI (0.10;0.23)] and dupilumab [EASI75, RD 0.37, 95% CI (0.32;0.42)] indicating short-term (ie 16-week treatment) superiority over placebo. Furthermore, efficacy analyses of AZA and CSA indicated short-term superiority over placebo; however, nonvalidated scores were used and can therefore not be compared to EASI.<br />Conclusion: The most robust, replicated high-quality trial evidence is present for the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for up to 1 year in adults. Robust trial evidence was further revealed for AZA, baricitinib and CSA. Methodological restrictions led to limited evidence-based conclusions for all other systemic treatments. Head-to-head trials with novel systemic treatments are required to clarify the future role of conventional therapies.<br /> (© 2020 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1398-9995
Volume :
76
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Allergy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33074565
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14631