Back to Search Start Over

The role of 99m Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: comparison with 99m Tc-MIBI planar scintigraphy and ultrasonography.

Authors :
Jiang SQ
Yang T
Zou Q
Xu L
Ye T
Kang YQ
Li WR
Jiao J
Zhang Y
Source :
BMC medical imaging [BMC Med Imaging] 2020 Oct 15; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 115. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 15.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT, <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI planar scintigraphy and ultrasonography (US) in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and to explore the factors that affect the sensitivity of <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT.<br />Methods: In this retrospective study, forty-six patients with SHPT who underwent <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI planar scintigraphy, <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT and US were enrolled. They underwent surgery within 1 month. We compared the sensitivity of the different imaging methods based on the lesions according to the pathological results. The parathyroid lesions on <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT images were divided into missed diagnosis group (MDG) and non-missed diagnosis group (NMDG). We compared the lesion to background ratio (LBR), maximum diameter, volume, the mean CT Hounsfield unit values (CT <subscript>mean</subscript> ) and location of lesions between MDG and NMDG.<br />Results: The sensitivity of <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT, <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI planar scintigraphy and US were 70.30% versus 48.48% versus 61.82%, respectively. The sensitivity of <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT combined US was 79.39%, which was higher than <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT with significant difference (P = 0.000). On <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT images, the LBR, maximum diameter and volume of lesions in MDG was smaller than those in NMDG with significant difference (P < 0.001). The average LBR, maximum diameter and volume of lesions in MDG and NMDG were 3.42 ± 1.28, 9.32 ± 2.69 mm, 208.51 ± 163.22 mm <superscript>3</superscript> versus 6.75 ± 5.08, 15.03 ± 4.94 mm and 863.85 ± 1216.0 mm <superscript>3</superscript> , respectively.<br />Conclusions: <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT exhibited the highest sensitivity among the three methods. When <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT combined with US, the sensitivity can be further improved. Lesions with lower MIBI uptake and smaller lesions on <superscript>99m</superscript> Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT images were easily missed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2342
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC medical imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33059621
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00517-9