Back to Search Start Over

Preference for mode of delivery in a low-risk population in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors :
Naudé N
Horak TA
Fawcus S
Stewart CJ
Lindow SW
Source :
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology [Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol] 2020 Nov; Vol. 254, pp. 259-265. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 25.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: There has been an increase in Caesarean section rates in many developed countries with maternal request frequently being cited as a reason. There are few studies examining African women's preference for mode of delivery. The objectives this study were to determine women's preference for mode of delivery in a low risk population to describe the major reasons for their preferences.<br />Study Design: Women over the age of 18 with a singleton low risk pregnancy were recruited during the third trimester. Two trained interviewers conducted a questionnaire in the women's preferred language regarding her preference for mode of delivery.<br />Results: Of the 195 women that participated, 160 (82.1 %) indicated a preference for vaginal delivery, 5 (2.6 %) preferred a Caesarean delivery, and 30 women (15.4 %) were unsure about their preferred mode of delivery. There was a significant association between delivery preference and age, ethnicity and HIV status. Level of education, employment, income, relationship status, and parity demonstrated no statistical association. In addition, 106 (54.4 %) did not believe that women should be given the right to request a Caesarean section.<br />Conclusion: The majority of women prefer to have a vaginal delivery. In this low risk population, 15.4 % of women were unsure about their preference.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-7654
Volume :
254
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33032102
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.028