Back to Search Start Over

Description and psychometric properties of a prototype to test tactile acuity in the neck.

Authors :
Olthof NA
Harvie DS
Henderson C
Thompson B
Sharp R
Craig-Ward L
Weermeijer JD
Sterling M
Moseley GL
Coppieters MW
Source :
Musculoskeletal science & practice [Musculoskelet Sci Pract] 2021 Feb; Vol. 51, pp. 102259. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 14.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Clinical tools assessing tactile acuity in people with persistent pain have limitations. Therefore, a novel and semi-automated tool was developed: The Imprint Tactile Acuity Device (iTAD).<br />Aim: To describe the iTAD prototype and present the psychometric properties of its tactile acuity assessments: the localisation test, the orientation test and the overall score (mean of both tests).<br />Method: A test-retest design with fifty healthy participants was used to assess intra-rater reliability (ICC <subscript>(2.1)</subscript> ), internal consistency (ICC <subscript>(2.4)</subscript> ) and measurement error (SEM) of the three assessments (0-100% accuracy scores each) performed at the neck. Using a known-group comparison design, balanced by age and sex, scores of thirty individuals with persistent neck pain were compared to thirty healthy controls to determine construct validity.<br />Results: The ICC <subscript>(2,1)</subscript> and ICC <subscript>(2,4)</subscript> were 0.60 and 0.78 for the localisation test, 0.66 and 0.77 for the orientation test, and 0.73 and 0.84 for the overall score. The SEMs were 9.0%, 8.1% and 6.0%, respectively. No fixed or proportional bias, or signs of heteroscedasticity were observed. Overall, no between group differences were observed (p = 0.49). In the male subgroup, however, the overall score was lower for people with neck pain than for healthy participants (mean difference (SE); 7.6% (2.5); p = 0.008).<br />Discussion: The tactile acuity assessments of the iTAD demonstrate moderate reliability and good internal consistency. Measurement errors appear comparable to currently preferred methods. Clear construct validity was not established, but results may be biased by design issues of the prototype. Taken together, the iTAD shows promise but further fine-tuning is needed.<br /> (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2468-7812
Volume :
51
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Musculoskeletal science & practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33023867
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102259