Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical Features and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Secondary to Gastroenteropancreatic Site: An Analysis by Applying the Grading Classification.
- Source :
-
Journal of oncology [J Oncol] 2020 Sep 15; Vol. 2020, pp. 6572398. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 15 (Print Publication: 2020). - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Method: Data of patients who were surgically treated and clinicopathologically diagnosed as (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2006 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed by the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs.<br />Results: We identified 150 patients with (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs, including 10 patients with G1 NETs, 26 with G2 NETs, 33 with G3 NETs, and 81 with G3 NECs. There were significant differences between patients with G1/G2/G3 NETs and those with G3 NECs, such as age at diagnosis ( P =0.041), synchronous liver lesion ( P =0.032), incidental diagnosis ( P =0.014), tumor largest diameter ( P =0.047), vascular invasion ( P =0.017), and extrahepatic metastatic disease ( P =0.029). The estimated 3-year overall survival for patients with G1 NETs, G2 NETs, G3 NETs, and G3 NECs was 100%, 79.4%, 49.5%, and 20.7%, respectively ( P < 0.001). The survival of G1 NETs or G2 NETs was significantly better than that of G3 NETs ( P =0.013, P =0.037, respectively) and G3 NECs ( P =0.001, P < 0.001; respectively). Patients with G3 NECs present notably worse survival than those with G3 NETs ( P =0.012), while survival comparison between G1 NETs and G2 NETs was not statistically different ( P =0.131). The grading classification for (GEP)-NENs was an effective independent predictor of survival for (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs (hazard ratio: 4.234; 95% confidence intervals: 1.984-6.763; P =0.003).<br />Conclusion: Our demonstration revealed that the grading classification for (GEP)-NENs could well stratify (MH)-NENs secondary to (GEP)-NENs into prognostic groups and supported its wide use in clinical practice.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and they did not have any sponsorship.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Min Yang et al.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1687-8450
- Volume :
- 2020
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33014053
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6572398