Back to Search
Start Over
Diagnostic performance in gastric cancer is higher using endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging than using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging.
- Source :
-
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [Gastric Cancer] 2021 Mar; Vol. 24 (2), pp. 417-427. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 03. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: For diagnosing gastric cancer, differences in the diagnostic performance between endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging have not been reported. We aimed to clarify these differences by analyzing diagnoses made by endoscopists in Japan.<br />Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study used 106 cancerous and 106 non-cancerous images obtained via both modalities (total, 424 images) for diagnosis. Sixty-one endoscopists with varying experience levels from 45 institutions were included. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated to determine the diagnostic performance of each modality and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.<br />Results: Among all endoscopists, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were higher with endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging than with magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (percentage [95% confidence interval]: 78.8% [76.4-83.0%] versus 72.2% [69.3-73.6%], p < 0.0001; 82.1% [78.3-85.9%] versus 64.2% [60.4-69.8%], p < 0.0001; 88.7% [82.6-90.7%] versus 78.5% [75.4-85.1%], p = 0.0023; 79.0% [75.3-80.5%] versus 68.5% [66.4-71.6%], p < 0.0001, respectively). In the magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging-trained group, these values were also higher with endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging than with magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0143, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value were higher with endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging than with magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in the magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging-untrained group (p = 0.0041, p = 0.0049, and p = 0.0098, respectively).<br />Conclusions: Diagnostic performance was higher using endocytoscopy with narrow-band imaging than using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging. Our results may help change the technique used to diagnose gastric cancer.
- Subjects :
- Case-Control Studies
Clinical Competence
Early Detection of Cancer methods
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods
Humans
Japan
Narrow Band Imaging methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Magnification methods
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Early Detection of Cancer statistics & numerical data
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal statistics & numerical data
Narrow Band Imaging statistics & numerical data
Radiographic Magnification statistics & numerical data
Stomach Neoplasms diagnosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1436-3305
- Volume :
- 24
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33011866
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01125-w