Back to Search Start Over

Infections in Infants with SCID: Isolation, Infection Screening, and Prophylaxis in PIDTC Centers.

Authors :
Dorsey MJ
Wright NAM
Chaimowitz NS
Dávila Saldaña BJ
Miller H
Keller MD
Thakar MS
Shah AJ
Abu-Arja R
Andolina J
Aquino V
Barnum JL
Bednarski JJ
Bhatia M
Bonilla FA
Butte MJ
Bunin NJ
Chandra S
Chaudhury S
Chen K
Chong H
Cuvelier GDE
Dalal J
DeFelice ML
DeSantes KB
Forbes LR
Gillio A
Goldman F
Joshi AY
Kapoor N
Knutsen AP
Kobrynski L
Lieberman JA
Leiding JW
Oshrine B
Patel KP
Prockop S
Quigg TC
Quinones R
Schultz KR
Seroogy C
Shyr D
Siegel S
Smith AR
Torgerson TR
Vander Lugt MT
Yu LC
Cowan MJ
Buckley RH
Dvorak CC
Griffith LM
Haddad E
Kohn DB
Logan B
Notarangelo LD
Pai SY
Puck J
Pulsipher MA
Heimall J
Source :
Journal of clinical immunology [J Clin Immunol] 2021 Jan; Vol. 41 (1), pp. 38-50. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 02.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) enrolled children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in a prospective natural history study of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcomes over the last decade. Despite newborn screening (NBS) for SCID, infections occurred prior to HSCT. This study's objectives were to define the types and timing of infection prior to HSCT in patients diagnosed via NBS or by family history (FH) and to understand the breadth of strategies employed at PIDTC centers for infection prevention.<br />Methods: We analyzed retrospective data on infections and pre-transplant management in patients with SCID diagnosed by NBS and/or FH and treated with HSCT between 2010 and 2014. PIDTC centers were surveyed in 2018 to understand their practices and protocols for pre-HSCT management.<br />Results: Infections were more common in patients diagnosed via NBS (55%) versus those diagnosed via FH (19%) (p = 0.012). Outpatient versus inpatient management did not impact infections (47% vs 35%, respectively; p = 0.423). There was no consensus among PIDTC survey respondents as to the best setting (inpatient vs outpatient) for pre-HSCT management. While isolation practices varied, immunoglobulin replacement and antimicrobial prophylaxis were more uniformly implemented.<br />Conclusion: Infants with SCID diagnosed due to FH had lower rates of infection and proceeded to HSCT more quickly than did those diagnosed via NBS. Pre-HSCT management practices were highly variable between centers, although uses of prophylaxis and immunoglobulin support were more consistent. This study demonstrates a critical need for development of evidence-based guidelines for the pre-HSCT management of infants with SCID following an abnormal NBS.<br />Trial Registration: NCT01186913.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1573-2592
Volume :
41
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33006109
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-020-00865-9