Longitudinal Strain and Strain Rate for Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Traditional parameters have limited value to estimate left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) in orthotropic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. We hypothesized that global longitudinal strain (GLS), diastolic, and systolic strain rate (SR) would be depressed in OHT recipients with elevated LVFP and could overcome the limitations of traditional parameters. We studied consecutively OHT patients at the time of endomyocardial biopsies and retrospectively pretransplantation studies conforming to the same protocol. Comprehensive echocardiography with strain measurements was performed. Results were compared with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) obtained from right heart catheterization that was performed just after the echocardiography study. In all, 74 studies were performed in 50 OHT recipients. Mean PWCP was 11.8 ± 4.3 mm Hg (range: 4 to 25 mm Hg). Several parameters, but not left atrial volume index, mitral inflow velocities, annular velocities, and their ratio (E/e'), were different between studies with normal (n = 47) and elevated PCWP (n = 27). Area Under Curve for GLS (0.932*), E/e' _SR (0.849*), and systolic SR (0.848*) (*p <0.0001) were more accurate than traditional parameters for predicting PCWP>12 mm Hg. GLS, systolic SR and E/e' _SR remained accurate regardless of LV ejection fraction and allograft vasculopathy. Meanwhile, E/e' was accurate to predict PWCP in native failing hearts before transplantation. Changes in GLS and E/e' _SR tracked accurately changes in PCWP. In conclusion, traditional indices of diastolic function perform poorly in OHT recipients, whereas GLS and E/e' _SR provide reliable means of LVFP, irrespective of ejection fraction and allograft vasculopathy. These parameters also track reasonably well the changes in LVFP.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relations that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this study.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)