Back to Search Start Over

Reproducibility of the CO rebreathing technique with a lower CO dose and a shorter rebreathing duration at sea level and at 2320 m of altitude.

Authors :
Oberholzer L
Bonne TC
Breenfeldt Andersen A
Bejder J
Højgaard Christensen R
Baastrup Nordsborg N
Lundby C
Source :
Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation [Scand J Clin Lab Invest] 2020 Nov; Vol. 80 (7), pp. 590-599. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 21.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Total hemoglobin mass (Hb <subscript>mass</subscript> ) is routinely assessed in studies by the carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing. Its clinical application is often hindered due to the consequent rise in carboxyhemoglobin (%HbCO) and the concern of CO toxicity. We tested the reproducibility of the CO rebreathing with a CO dose of 0.5 mL/kg body mass (CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> ) compared to 1.5 mL/kg (CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> ) and when shortening the CO rebreathing protocol. Therefore, CO rebreathing was performed 1×/day in eight healthy individuals on four consecutive days. On each day, either CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> (CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> -1 and CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> -2) or CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> (CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> -1 and CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> -2) was administered. Venous blood samples to determine %HbCO and quantify Hb <subscript>mass</subscript> were obtained prior to, and at 6 (T <subscript>6</subscript> ), 8 (T <subscript>8</subscript> ) and 10 min (T <subscript>10</subscript> ) of CO rebreathing. This protocol was tested at sea level and at 2320 m to investigate the altitude-related measurement error. At sea level, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) in Hb <subscript>mass</subscript> between CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> -1 and CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> -2 was 26 g (-26; 79 g) and between CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> -1 and CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> -2, it was 17 g (-18; 52 g) <subscript>.</subscript> The respective typical error (TE) corresponded to 2.4% (CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> ) and 1.5% (CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> ), while it was 6.5% and 3.0% at 2320 m. With CO <subscript>0.5</subscript> , shortening the CO rebreathing resulted in a TE for Hb <subscript>mass</subscript> of 4.4% (T <subscript>8</subscript> vs. T <subscript>10</subscript> ) and 14.1% (T <subscript>6</subscript> vs T <subscript>10</subscript> ) and with CO <subscript>1.5</subscript> , TE was 1.6% and 5.8%. In conclusion, the CO dose and rebreathing time for the CO rebreathing procedure can be decreased at the cost of a measurement error ranging from 1.5-14.1%.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1502-7686
Volume :
80
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32955368
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1818282