Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic models integrating quantitative parameters from baseline and interim positron emission computed tomography in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: post-hoc analysis from the SAKK38/07 clinical trial.

Authors :
Zucca E
Cascione L
Ruberto T
Facchinelli D
Schär S
Hayoz S
Dirnhofer S
Giovanella L
Bargetzi M
Mamot C
Ceriani L
Source :
Hematological oncology [Hematol Oncol] 2020 Dec; Vol. 38 (5), pp. 715-725. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 04.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) enrolled in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed to test the impact of quantitative parameters from interim PET/CT scans on overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival. We centrally reviewed baseline and interim PET/CT scans of 138 patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone given every 14 days (R-CHOP14) in the SAKK38/07 trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00544219). Cutoff values for maximum standardized uptake value (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> ), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic heterogeneity (MH) were defined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Responses were scored using the Deauville scale (DS). Patients with DS 5 at interim PET/CT (defined by uptake >2 times higher than in normal liver) had worse PFS (P = 0.014) and OS (P < 0.0001). A SUV <subscript>max</subscript> reduction (Δ) greater than 66% was associated with longer PFS (P = 0.0027) and OS (P < 0.0001). Elevated SUV <subscript>max</subscript> , MTV, TLG, and MH at interim PET/CT also identified patients with poorer outcome. At multivariable analysis, ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> and baseline MTV appeared independent outcome predictors. A prognostic model integrating ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> and baseline MTV discriminated three risk groups with significantly (log-rank test for trend, P < 0.0001) different PFS and OS. Moreover, the integration of MH and clinical prognostic indices could further refine the prediction of OS. PET metrics-derived prognostic models perform better than the international indices alone. Integration of baseline and interim PET metrics identified poor-risk DLBCL patients who might benefit from alternative treatments.<br /> (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1099-1069
Volume :
38
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hematological oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32947651
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2805