Back to Search Start Over

EGFR in enterocytes & endothelium and HIF1α in enterocytes are dispensable for massive small bowel resection induced angiogenesis.

Authors :
Onufer EJ
Aladegbami B
Imai T
Seiler K
Bajinting A
Courtney C
Sutton S
Bustos A
Yao J
Yeh CH
Sescleifer A
Wang LV
Guo J
Warner BW
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 15; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0236964. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 15 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) results from significant loss of small intestinal length. In response to this loss, adaptation occurs, with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) being a key driver. Besides enhanced enterocyte proliferation, we have revealed that adaptation is associated with angiogenesis. Further, we have found that small bowel resection (SBR) is associated with diminished oxygen delivery and elevated levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1α).<br />Methods: We ablated EGFR in the epithelium and endothelium as well as HIF1α in the epithelium, ostensibly the most hypoxic element. Using these mice, we determined the effects of these genetic manipulations on intestinal blood flow after SBR using photoacoustic microscopy (PAM), intestinal adaptation and angiogenic responses. Then, given that endothelial cells require a stromal support cell for efficient vascularization, we ablated EGFR expression in intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts (ISEMFs) to determine its effects on angiogenesis in a microfluidic model of human small intestine.<br />Results: Despite immediate increased demand in oxygen extraction fraction measured by PAM in all mouse lines, were no differences in enterocyte and endothelial cell EGFR knockouts or enterocyte HIF1α knockouts by POD3. Submucosal capillary density was also unchanged by POD7 in all mouse lines. Additionally, EGFR silencing in ISEMFs did not impact vascular network development in a microfluidic device of human small intestine.<br />Conclusions: Overall, despite the importance of EGFR in facilitating intestinal adaptation after SBR, it had no impact on angiogenesis in three cell types-enterocytes, endothelial cells, and ISEMFs. Epithelial ablation of HIF1α also had no impact on angiogenesis in the setting of SBS.<br />Competing Interests: LVW has financial interests in Microphotoacoustics, Inc., which did not support this work. AKA reports receiving research support from Verastem, Selexys, Karyopharm, Cell Works, Cleave Bioscience, Glycomimetics, Abbvie and Vasculox, none of which supported this work. AKA is also the founder and owner of Targeted Therapeutics LLC and Cellatrix LLC, neither of which supported this work. All other authors have no other financial conflicts of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
15
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32931498
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236964