Back to Search Start Over

The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018.

Authors :
Lee DS
Fahey DW
Skowron A
Allen MR
Burkhardt U
Chen Q
Doherty SJ
Freeman S
Forster PM
Fuglestvedt J
Gettelman A
De León RR
Lim LL
Lund MT
Millar RJ
Owen B
Penner JE
Pitari G
Prather MJ
Sausen R
Wilcox LJ
Source :
Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) [Atmos Environ (1994)] 2021 Jan 01; Vol. 244, pp. 117834. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 03.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Global aviation operations contribute to anthropogenic climate change via a complex set of processes that lead to a net surface warming. Of importance are aviation emissions of carbon dioxide (CO <subscript>2</subscript> ), nitrogen oxides (NO <subscript>x</subscript> ), water vapor, soot and sulfate aerosols, and increased cloudiness due to contrail formation. Aviation grew strongly over the past decades (1960-2018) in terms of activity, with revenue passenger kilometers increasing from 109 to 8269 billion km yr <superscript>-1</superscript> , and in terms of climate change impacts, with CO <subscript>2</subscript> emissions increasing by a factor of 6.8 to 1034 Tg CO <subscript>2</subscript> yr <superscript>-1</superscript> . Over the period 2013-2018, the growth rates in both terms show a marked increase. Here, we present a new comprehensive and quantitative approach for evaluating aviation climate forcing terms. Both radiative forcing (RF) and effective radiative forcing (ERF) terms and their sums are calculated for the years 2000-2018. Contrail cirrus, consisting of linear contrails and the cirrus cloudiness arising from them, yields the largest positive net (warming) ERF term followed by CO <subscript>2</subscript> and NO <subscript>x</subscript> emissions. The formation and emission of sulfate aerosol yields a negative (cooling) term. The mean contrail cirrus ERF/RF ratio of 0.42 indicates that contrail cirrus is less effective in surface warming than other terms. For 2018 the net aviation ERF is +100.9 milliwatts (mW) m <superscript>-2</superscript> (5-95% likelihood range of (55, 145)) with major contributions from contrail cirrus (57.4 mW m <superscript>-2</superscript> ), CO <subscript>2</subscript> (34.3 mW m <superscript>-2</superscript> ), and NO <subscript>x</subscript> (17.5 mW m <superscript>-2</superscript> ). Non-CO <subscript>2</subscript> terms sum to yield a net positive (warming) ERF that accounts for more than half (66%) of the aviation net ERF in 2018. Using normalization to aviation fuel use, the contribution of global aviation in 2011 was calculated to be 3.5 (4.0, 3.4) % of the net anthropogenic ERF of 2290 (1130, 3330) mW m <superscript>-2</superscript> . Uncertainty distributions (5%, 95%) show that non-CO <subscript>2</subscript> forcing terms contribute about 8 times more than CO <subscript>2</subscript> to the uncertainty in the aviation net ERF in 2018. The best estimates of the ERFs from aviation aerosol-cloud interactions for soot and sulfate remain undetermined. CO <subscript>2</subscript> -warming-equivalent emissions based on global warming potentials (GWP* method) indicate that aviation emissions are currently warming the climate at approximately three times the rate of that associated with aviation CO <subscript>2</subscript> emissions alone. CO <subscript>2</subscript> and NO <subscript>x</subscript> aviation emissions and cloud effects remain a continued focus of anthropogenic climate change research and policy discussions.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1352-2310
Volume :
244
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32895604
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834