Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Speech Performance in Bimodal versus Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors :
Sturm JJ
Kuhlmey M
Alexiades G
Hoffman R
Kim AH
Source :
The Laryngoscope [Laryngoscope] 2021 Apr; Vol. 131 (4), pp. E1322-E1327. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 02.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether listening with two cochlear implants (bilateral) offers significant benefits in terms of speech perception over listening with one cochlear implant and one hearing aid (bimodal).<br />Methods: Retrospective review of bilateral cochlear implant recipients (24 pediatric and 26 adult). Bimodal listening was compared to bilateral listening in terms of speech perception performance at 1-year post second implant under three listening conditions: 50 dBHL, 35 dBHL, and 50 dBHL+5 SNR. Changes in speech performance from bimodal (before second implant) to bilateral (after second implant) listening were determined within subjects and compared to a separate control group of bimodal users matched for age of first implantation who never received a second implant (10 pediatric and 20 adult).<br />Results: In the pediatric group, compared to bimodal listening prior to a second implant, speech perception scores with bilateral implants increased significantly when measured at 50 dBHL, 35 dBHL, and 50 dBHL+5 SNR. By contrast, pediatric bimodal controls who never received a second implant failed to demonstrate similar improvement over 1 year's time. In the adult group, compared to bimodal listening prior to a second implant, speech perception scores with bilateral implants increased when measured at 50 dBHL, but were not significantly different at 35 dBHL and 50 dBHL + 5 SNR. Adult bimodal controls who never received a second implant failed to demonstrate significant improvement in all conditions over 1 year's time.<br />Conclusion: Bilateral listening with two cochlear implants improved speech perception performance relative to bimodal listening in the pediatric population. Improvement in the adult population was not as significant.<br />Level of Evidence: 4, Retrospective Chart Review. Laryngoscope, 131:E1322-E1327, 2021.<br /> (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1531-4995
Volume :
131
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Laryngoscope
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32876332
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29062