Back to Search Start Over

National Variation of Insurance Coverage for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery.

Authors :
Gadkaree SK
DeVore EK
Richburg K
Lee LN
Derakhshan A
McCarty JC
Seth R
Shaye DA
Source :
Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine [Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med] 2021 Jul-Aug; Vol. 23 (4), pp. 270-277. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 29.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Gender-affirming surgery may be pursued by individuals experiencing gender dysphoria. Although genital and chest procedures are classified as medically necessary, facial feminization surgeries (FFSs) are often considered cosmetic. Insurance companies may limit coverage of these procedures, especially in states less supportive of transgender individuals. Objectives: To determine insurance coverage and ease of finding policy information for FFSs, and to analyze differences based on state advocacy. Methods: Insurance policies for the top three commercial health plans per state were reviewed. Coverage status was determined by web-based search and telephone interviews. Ease of gathering policy information was assessed using a post-task questionnaire graded on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher numbers (e.g., 7) representing relative ease. State advocacy was determined by the number of state laws and policies affecting the transgender community. Results: Of the 150 insurance policies, only 27 (18%) held favorable policies for FFS. Most favorable companies covered chondrolaryngoplasty, with 78% ( n  = 21) offering preauthorization. Mean ease of use was rated 6, with 12 companies requiring a telephone interview. Insurance policies in states with laws driving transgender equity covered more FFS procedures ( p  = 0.043), whereas those in restrictive states offered less overall coverage ( p  = 0.023). Conclusions: FFS is rarely covered by commercial insurance companies, especially in states with less legal support for transgender individuals. Policy information remains difficult to obtain, with variable coverage by employer and no standardized medical necessity criteria. Limited coverage, lack of easily accessible information, and absence of universal criteria may act as barriers to FFS.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2689-3622
Volume :
23
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32865436
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0226