Antibacterial defense in bull and boar semen: A putative link to the microbiome and reproductive strategy?

Several domestic and wildlife species have been shown to possess antibacterial defenses in their ejaculate most probably in order to increase the fertilization success and protect against sexually transmitted pathogens. However, very little is known about the consequences and factors influencing the differences within and between species as far as ejaculate-associated immunity. In the present study, we have analyzed bacterial killing activity (BKA) against Escherichia (E.) coli and Staphylococcus (S.) aureus as well as lysozyme concentrations (LC) in seminal plasma from 60 Fleckvieh bulls. Further, sperm quality and its association with BKA and LC were determined. Twenty percent of the individuals displayed BKA against both bacteria, 78.3% against S. aureus only and 1.7% of the bulls did not indicate any BKA in seminal plasma. No bulls with seminal plasma BKA only against E. coli were identified; implying that 80.0% of the tested bulls had no ejaculate associated defense mechanisms against this gram-negative bacterial species in place. This is in striking contrast to results of Pietrain boars within our previous study, in which 42.8% of the 119 boars expressed an antibacterial activity against E. coli in seminal plasma, 10.9% amongst them with BKA against E. coli only. LC was higher in the bull group with BKA against both bacteria (1.2 ± 0.6 μg/mL) compared to the group with BKA against S. aureus only (0.7 ± 0.3 μg/mL), but - if calculated over all individuals - LC in bulls (0.8 ± 0.4 μg/mL) was lower compared to boars (2.4 ± 1.2 μg/mL). LC showed positive correlations to the age of the bulls and sperm quality as well as a negative relation to bacterial load in raw semen although the highest bacterial contamination was found in animals with seminal plasma BKA against both strains. We discuss the obtained results with regards to possible differences within the microbiome of female and male genital tracts and the reproductive strategies (vaginal vs. uterine depositors) in these two livestock species. Besides identifying the responsible molecules, future phylogenetically controlled comparative studies are needed for a better understanding of the evolution of species differences in ejaculate-associated antibacterial defenses.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)