Back to Search
Start Over
Pronuclear and blastocyst morphology are associated age-dependently with embryo ploidy in in vitro fertilization cycles.
- Source :
-
Human fertility (Cambridge, England) [Hum Fertil (Camb)] 2022 Apr; Vol. 25 (2), pp. 369-376. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 20. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- This retrospective study aimed to assess the relationship between standard markers of embryo morphology, maternal age and blastocyst ploidy determined by trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and Next-generation Sequencing (NGS). A total of 774 oocytes and embryos from 288 PGT-A cycles were scored for pronuclear, cleavage stage and blastocyst morphology. Pronuclear oocytes aligned between the nuclei and presenting equal number of nucleolus precursor bodies (NPBs) were designated Z1, oocytes showing equal number of NPBs, but not aligned, as Z2 while Z3 oocytes had an unequal number of NBPs between the nuclei or NPBs aligned in one nucleus and non-aligned in the other. Pronuclear oocytes with unequal-sized or non-aligned nuclei were designated Z4. Blastocysts were graded as BL1 (AA, AB or BA), BL2 (BB or CB) and BL3 (BC or CC) based on the combination of inner cell mass (ICM) and TE scores. Pronuclear and blastocyst morphology were correlated with aneuploidy in a < 40-year-old group ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), but not in those ≥40 years. Interestingly, BL3 blastocysts classified as Z1 or Z3-Z4 on day-1 had different aneuploidy rates (BL3/Z1 = 46.7% vs. BL3/Z3-Z4 = 90.0%, p < 0.05). In summary, our data showed that pronuclear and blastocyst morphology are associated with blastocyst ploidy in younger patients. This may help embryo selection for embryo transfer and decision-making on which blastocysts should be biopsied in PGT-A cycles.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1742-8149
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Human fertility (Cambridge, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32815749
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2020.1808716