Back to Search Start Over

Experienced Demand Does Not Affect Subsequent Sleep and the Cortisol Awakening Response.

Authors :
Elder GJ
Wetherell MA
Pollet TV
Barclay NL
Ellis JG
Source :
Nature and science of sleep [Nat Sci Sleep] 2020 Jul 30; Vol. 12, pp. 537-543. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 30 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Purpose: Stress is associated with subjective and objective sleep disturbances; however, it is not known whether stress disrupts sleep and relevant physiological markers of stress immediately after it is experienced. The present study examined whether demand, in the form of cognitive tasks, disrupted sleep and the cortisol awakening response (CAR), depending on whether it was experienced or just anticipated.<br />Participants and Methods: Subjective and objective sleep was measured in 22 healthy adults on three nights (Nights 0-2) in a sleep laboratory using sleep diaries and polysomnography. Saliva samples were obtained at awakening, +15, +30, +45 and +60 minutes on each subsequent day (Day 1-3) and CAR measurement indices were derived: awakening cortisol levels, the mean increase in cortisol levels (MnInc) and total cortisol secretion (AUC <subscript>G</subscript> ). On Night 1, participants were informed that they were required to complete a series of demanding cognitive tasks within the sleep laboratory during the following day. Participants completed the tasks as expected or unexpectedly performed sedentary activities.<br />Results: Compared to the no-demand group, the demand group displayed significantly higher levels of state anxiety immediately completing the first task. There were no subsequent differences between the demand and no-demand groups in Night 2 subjective sleep continuity, objective sleep continuity or architecture, or on any Day 3 CAR measure.<br />Conclusion: These results indicate that sleep and the CAR are not differentially affected depending on whether or not an anticipated stressor is then experienced. This provides further evidence to indicate that the CAR is a marker of anticipation and not recovery. In order to disrupt sleep, a stressor may need to be personally relevant or of a prolonged duration or intensity.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests.<br /> (© 2020 Elder et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1179-1608
Volume :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nature and science of sleep
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32801979
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S231484