Back to Search Start Over

Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs.

Authors :
St-Onge C
Young M
Renaud JS
Cummings BA
Drescher O
Varpio L
Source :
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges [Acad Med] 2021 Feb 01; Vol. 96 (2), pp. 271-277.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Written examinations such as multiple-choice question (MCQ) exams are a key assessment strategy in health professions education (HPE), frequently used to provide feedback, to determine competency, or for licensure decisions. However, traditional psychometric approaches for monitoring the quality of written exams, defined as items that are discriminant and contribute to increase the overall reliability and validity of the exam scores, usually warrant larger samples than are typically available in HPE contexts. The authors conducted a descriptive exploratory study to document how undergraduate medical education (UME) programs ensure the quality of their written exams, particularly MCQs.<br />Method: Using a qualitative descriptive methodology, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with 16 key informants from 10 Canadian UME programs in 2018. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, coded by the primary investigator, and co-coded by a second team member. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively. Research team members engaged in analysis across phases, and consensus was reached on the interpretation of findings via group discussion.<br />Results: Participants focused their answers around MCQ-related practices, reporting using several indicators of quality such as alignment between items and course objectives and psychometric properties (difficulty and discrimination). The authors clustered findings around 5 main themes: processes for creating MCQ exams, processes for building quality MCQ exams, processes for monitoring the quality of MCQ exams, motivation to build quality MCQ exams, and suggestions for improving processes.<br />Conclusions: Participants reported engaging multiple strategies to ensure the quality of MCQ exams. Assessment quality considerations were integrated throughout the development and validation phases, reflecting recent work regarding validity as a social imperative.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-808X
Volume :
96
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32769474
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003659