Back to Search Start Over

Head home: a prospective cohort study of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool at a district general hospital.

Authors :
Aldridge P
Castle H
Phillips C
Russell E
Guerrero-Luduena R
Rout R
Source :
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ [Emerg Med J] 2020 Nov; Vol. 37 (11), pp. 680-685. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 05.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: To assess if a nurse-led application of a paediatric head injury clinical decision tool would be safe compared with current practice.<br />Methods: All paediatric (<17 years) patients with head injuries presenting to Frimley Park Emergency Department (ED), England from 1 May to 31 October 2018 were prospectively screened by a nurse using a mandated electronic 'Head Injury Discharge At Triage' questionnaire (HIDATq). We determined which patients underwent CT of brain and whether there was a clinically important intracranial injury or re-presentation to the ED. The negative predictive value of the screening tool was assessed. We determined what proportion of patients could have been sent home from triage using this tool.<br />Results: Of the 1739 patients screened, 61 had CTs performed due to head injury (six abnormal) with a CT rate of 3.5% and 2% re-presentations. Of the entire cohort, 1052 screened negative. 1 CT occurred in this group showing no abnormalities. Of those screened negative, 349 (33%)/1052 had 'no other injuries' and 543 (52%)/1052 had 'abrasions or lacerations'. HIDATq's negative predictive value for CT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.4% to 99.9%) and 100% (95% CI 99.0% to 100%) for intracranial injury. The positive predictive value of the tool was low. Five patients screened negative and re-presented within 72 hours but did not require CT imaging.<br />Conclusion: A negative HIDATq appears safe in our ED. Potentially 20% (349/1739) of all patients with head injuries presenting to our department could be discharged by nurses at triage with adequate safety netting advice. This increases to 50% (543/1739), if patients with lacerations or abrasions were given advice and discharged at triage. A large multicentre study is required to validate the tool.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-0213
Volume :
37
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32759348
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208892