Back to Search Start Over

Genome-wide Modeling of Polygenic Risk Score in Colorectal Cancer Risk.

Authors :
Thomas M
Sakoda LC
Hoffmeister M
Rosenthal EA
Lee JK
van Duijnhoven FJB
Platz EA
Wu AH
Dampier CH
de la Chapelle A
Wolk A
Joshi AD
Burnett-Hartman A
Gsur A
Lindblom A
Castells A
Win AK
Namjou B
Van Guelpen B
Tangen CM
He Q
Li CI
Schafmayer C
Joshu CE
Ulrich CM
Bishop DT
Buchanan DD
Schaid D
Drew DA
Muller DC
Duggan D
Crosslin DR
Albanes D
Giovannucci EL
Larson E
Qu F
Mentch F
Giles GG
Hakonarson H
Hampel H
Stanaway IB
Figueiredo JC
Huyghe JR
Minnier J
Chang-Claude J
Hampe J
Harley JB
Visvanathan K
Curtis KR
Offit K
Li L
Le Marchand L
Vodickova L
Gunter MJ
Jenkins MA
Slattery ML
Lemire M
Woods MO
Song M
Murphy N
Lindor NM
Dikilitas O
Pharoah PDP
Campbell PT
Newcomb PA
Milne RL
MacInnis RJ
Castellví-Bel S
Ogino S
Berndt SI
Bézieau S
Thibodeau SN
Gallinger SJ
Zaidi SH
Harrison TA
Keku TO
Hudson TJ
Vymetalkova V
Moreno V
Martín V
Arndt V
Wei WQ
Chung W
Su YR
Hayes RB
White E
Vodicka P
Casey G
Gruber SB
Schoen RE
Chan AT
Potter JD
Brenner H
Jarvik GP
Corley DA
Peters U
Hsu L
Source :
American journal of human genetics [Am J Hum Genet] 2020 Sep 03; Vol. 107 (3), pp. 432-444. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 05.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Accurate colorectal cancer (CRC) risk prediction models are critical for identifying individuals at low and high risk of developing CRC, as they can then be offered targeted screening and interventions to address their risks of developing disease (if they are in a high-risk group) and avoid unnecessary screening and interventions (if they are in a low-risk group). As it is likely that thousands of genetic variants contribute to CRC risk, it is clinically important to investigate whether these genetic variants can be used jointly for CRC risk prediction. In this paper, we derived and compared different approaches to generating predictive polygenic risk scores (PRS) from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) including 55,105 CRC-affected case subjects and 65,079 control subjects of European ancestry. We built the PRS in three ways, using (1) 140 previously identified and validated CRC loci; (2) SNP selection based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumping followed by machine-learning approaches; and (3) LDpred, a Bayesian approach for genome-wide risk prediction. We tested the PRS in an independent cohort of 101,987 individuals with 1,699 CRC-affected case subjects. The discriminatory accuracy, calculated by the age- and sex-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), was highest for the LDpred-derived PRS (AUC = 0.654) including nearly 1.2 M genetic variants (the proportion of causal genetic variants for CRC assumed to be 0.003), whereas the PRS of the 140 known variants identified from GWASs had the lowest AUC (AUC = 0.629). Based on the LDpred-derived PRS, we are able to identify 30% of individuals without a family history as having risk for CRC similar to those with a family history of CRC, whereas the PRS based on known GWAS variants identified only top 10% as having a similar relative risk. About 90% of these individuals have no family history and would have been considered average risk under current screening guidelines, but might benefit from earlier screening. The developed PRS offers a way for risk-stratified CRC screening and other targeted interventions.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-6605
Volume :
107
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of human genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32758450
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.07.006