Back to Search Start Over

Predicting Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: Performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and Development of a New Prognostic Model.

Authors :
Hernández-Boluda JC
Pereira A
Alvarez-Larran A
Martín AA
Benzaquen A
Aguirre L
Mora E
González P
Mora J
Dorado N
Sampol A
García-Gutiérrez V
López-Godino O
Fox ML
Reguera JL
Pérez-Encinas M
Pascual MJ
Xicoy B
Parody R
González-Pinedo L
Español I
Avendaño A
Correa JG
Vallejo C
Jurado M
García-Cadenas I
Osorio S
Durán MA
Sánchez-Guijo F
Cervantes F
Piñana JL
Source :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation [Biol Blood Marrow Transplant] 2020 Dec; Vol. 26 (12), pp. 2237-2244. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 24.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P < .001). We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1523-6536
Volume :
26
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32717433
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.022