Back to Search Start Over

A randomised controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: 12-month results.

Authors :
Stanojcic N
Roberts HW
Wagh VK
Li JO
Naderi K
O'Brart DP
Source :
The British journal of ophthalmology [Br J Ophthalmol] 2021 May; Vol. 105 (5), pp. 631-638. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 22.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: To report 12-month outcomes of randomised controlled trial comparing conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).<br />Methods: This was a single-centre, prospective single-masked randomised case-controlled trial. Four hundred patients were randomised to CPS or FLACS with the LenSx platform (Alcon Laboratories Inc.). Visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell loss (ECL), adverse events and quality of life outcomes, using EuroQOL 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-3 L) and cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires (Cat-PROM5), were recorded.<br />Results: Two hundred and thirty four patients (58.5%) attended 12-month follow-up (116 FLACS, 118 CPS). Mean LogMAR unaided distance visual acuity) (±SD) was 0.12 (0.18) with FLACS and 0.13 (0.19) with CPS (p=0.68; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]-0.06,0.04). Mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.1±0.6 diopters (D) with FLACS and -0.2±0.6 D with CPS (p=0.44; 95% CI -0.09, 0.21). Mean corrected distance visual acuity (±SD) was -0.01 (0.1) with FLACS and 0(0.1) with CPS (p=0.45; 95% CI -0.04,0.02). Two patients per group underwent YAG laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification (p=1). Mean ECL (per mm <superscript>2</superscript> ±SD) was 301±320 with FLACS and 228±303 with CPS (p=0.07; 95% CI -7.26, 153.26). Mean Cat-PROM scores (±SD) were -5.5 (2.6) with FLACS and -5.8 (2.5) with CPS (p=0.3; 95% CI 0.31,1.01). EQ5-3DL mean index score (±SD) was 0.92 (0.13) with FLACS and 0.89 (0.14) with CPS (p=0.1; 95% CI -0.1, 0.01). Vector analysis comparing manual limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) and intrastromal femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomies (iFAKs) showed a greater correction index (p=0.02; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.60) and smaller difference vector (p=0.046; 95% CI -0.54, -0.01) with iFAK.<br />Conclusions: There were no differences in vision, refraction, adverse postoperative events or PROMs between FLACS and CPS groups at 12 months. iFAKs may provide more effective astigmatic correction compared to LRIs, 12 months postoperatively.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: Professor O’Brart has held non-commercial grants from Alcon, Rayner and Avedro. Harry Roberts has undertaken consultancy work for Alcon in the past 12 months.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2079
Volume :
105
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32699049
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316311