Back to Search Start Over

Suboptimal glycemic control among subjects with diabetes mellitus in India: a subset analysis of cross-sectional wave-7 (2016) data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS).

Authors :
Ramachandran A
Jain SM
Mukherjee S
Phatak S
Pitale S
Singh SK
Agrawal N
Majumdar A
Deshpande N
Jhulka S
Minakshisundaram S
Chawla M
Lodha S
Maheshwari A
Makkar BM
Rao S
Shah P
Ghosh R
Mohanasundaram S
Menon S
Chodankar D
Kanade V
Trivedi C
Source :
Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism [Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab] 2020 Jun 27; Vol. 11, pp. 2042018820937217. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 27 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: To assess the real-world management practices of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in India.<br />Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between 7 March 2016 and 15 May 2016 in India as part of the seventh wave (2016) of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Adult subjects with T1DM or T2DM visiting physicians during a 2-week recruitment period were included.<br />Results: A total of 55 physicians included 539 subjects who met eligibility criteria. Of 495 subjects with T2DM, 303 were treated with oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) only, 158 were treated with OGLD + insulin, and 27 received insulin only. Among 44 subjects with T1DM receiving insulin, 13 (29.5%) were also treated with OGLD therapy. The most commonly used insulin regimens were basal alone (69/184; 37.5%) and premixed alone (63/184; 34.2%) in subjects with T2DM, and basal + prandial insulin (24/44; 54.5%) in subjects with T1DM. Proportions of subjects achieving glycemic targets were low [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7%: T1DM = 7.3% (3/44), T2DM = 25.2% (106/495); as targeted by the treating physician: T1DM = 31.8% (14/44), T2DM = 32.1% (59/185); global target: T1DM = 4.8% (2/42) and T2DM = 1.7% (8/482)]. In subjects with T2DM, HbA1c <7% was noted in 11/22 subjects receiving insulin only and 76/260 receiving only OGLDs. Lack of experience in self-managing insulin dosing, poor diabetes education and failure to titrate insulin dosages were the main reasons for non-achievement of glycemic targets.<br />Conclusion: Timely insulinization, education and empowerment of people with diabetes may help improve glycemic control in India.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: Shunmugavelu Minakshisundaram was a study investigator and received an honorarium during the period in which the study was conducted. Anirban Majumdar is a consultant and/or speaker for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk India, Sanofi India Limited, and Wockhardt India Ltd. that market different insulin preparations. MC is a member of the speaker bureau for Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, USV, IPCA, Biocon, and Cipla. SMJ has been associated with Sanofi, Novo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca for various trials and educational initiatives. AR, Sagarika Mukherjee, Sanjeev Phatak, Shailesh Pitale, NA, ND, SJ, SL, Anuj Maheshwari, BMM, SR, PS, and SKS declared no conflict of interest. RG, Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram, Shalini Menon, DC, VK, CT are employees of Sanofi.<br /> (© The Author(s), 2020.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2042-0188
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32647562
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018820937217