Back to Search Start Over

Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study.

Authors :
Gastaldi M
Scaranzin S
Jarius S
Wildeman B
Zardini E
Mallucci G
Rigoni E
Vegezzi E
Foiadelli T
Savasta S
Banfi P
Versino M
Benedetti L
Novi G
Mancardi MM
Giacomini T
Annovazzi P
Baroncini D
Ferraro D
Lampasona V
Reindl M
Waters P
Franciotta D
Source :
Journal of neurology [J Neurol] 2020 Dec; Vol. 267 (12), pp. 3555-3564. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 04.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: The detection of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is fundamental for the identification of MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), and the differential diagnosis of acquired demyelinating syndromes of the CNS, among which multiple sclerosis (MS). We compared the diagnostic performance of four cell-based assays (CBAs) for their detection.<br />Methods: Consecutive sera from 204 patients with 'possible MOGAD' (55), MS (112), and other neurological disorders (OND, 37) were tested for MOG-IgG with a live-CBA with anti-heavy-and-light chain secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> ), and a live-CBA for IgG <subscript>1</subscript> (LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> ). A subgroup of 71 patients was additionally tested with a live-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> ), and a commercial fixed-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> ) <subscript>.</subscript> RESULTS: Fifty-seven/204 patients (27.9%) were MOG-IgG-positive. Sensitivity was 89.1% (CI:77.8-95.9) and specificity 93.3% (CI:88.0-96.7) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> , and 74.6% (CI:61.0-85.3) and 100% (CI:97.6-100) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> . Eighteen of 57 (31%) samples showed discrepant results (all negative on LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> ); of these, three with 'possible MOGAD' showed high-titer MOG-IgG (≥ 1:640), and positivity for MOG-IgG <subscript>2</subscript> , whereas 15/18 had low-titer MOG-IgG (1:160/1:320) and mixed diagnoses (5 'possible MOGAD', 6 MS, 4 OND). In the subgroup analysis, sensitivity was 92.3% (CI:79.1-98.4) and specificity 97.0% (CI:83.8-99.9) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> , and 87.2% (CI:72.6-95.7) and 97.0% (CI:83.8-99.9) for FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> .<br />Conclusions: LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> showed the highest specificity but can miss MOG-IgG <subscript>2</subscript> reactivities, whose meaning warrants further investigations. Titration of samples tested with LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> / IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> is important for meaningful interpretation of the results. In the subgroup analysis, LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> yielded the highest accuracy, and FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> good specificity, but it was at risk of false-negative results.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1459
Volume :
267
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32623596
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10024-0