Back to Search
Start Over
Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study.
- Source :
-
Journal of neurology [J Neurol] 2020 Dec; Vol. 267 (12), pp. 3555-3564. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 04. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The detection of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is fundamental for the identification of MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), and the differential diagnosis of acquired demyelinating syndromes of the CNS, among which multiple sclerosis (MS). We compared the diagnostic performance of four cell-based assays (CBAs) for their detection.<br />Methods: Consecutive sera from 204 patients with 'possible MOGAD' (55), MS (112), and other neurological disorders (OND, 37) were tested for MOG-IgG with a live-CBA with anti-heavy-and-light chain secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> ), and a live-CBA for IgG <subscript>1</subscript> (LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> ). A subgroup of 71 patients was additionally tested with a live-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> ), and a commercial fixed-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> ) <subscript>.</subscript> RESULTS: Fifty-seven/204 patients (27.9%) were MOG-IgG-positive. Sensitivity was 89.1% (CI:77.8-95.9) and specificity 93.3% (CI:88.0-96.7) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> , and 74.6% (CI:61.0-85.3) and 100% (CI:97.6-100) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> . Eighteen of 57 (31%) samples showed discrepant results (all negative on LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> ); of these, three with 'possible MOGAD' showed high-titer MOG-IgG (≥ 1:640), and positivity for MOG-IgG <subscript>2</subscript> , whereas 15/18 had low-titer MOG-IgG (1:160/1:320) and mixed diagnoses (5 'possible MOGAD', 6 MS, 4 OND). In the subgroup analysis, sensitivity was 92.3% (CI:79.1-98.4) and specificity 97.0% (CI:83.8-99.9) for LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> , and 87.2% (CI:72.6-95.7) and 97.0% (CI:83.8-99.9) for FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> .<br />Conclusions: LCBA-IgG <subscript>1</subscript> showed the highest specificity but can miss MOG-IgG <subscript>2</subscript> reactivities, whose meaning warrants further investigations. Titration of samples tested with LCBA-IgG <subscript>H+L</subscript> / IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> is important for meaningful interpretation of the results. In the subgroup analysis, LCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> yielded the highest accuracy, and FCBA-IgG <subscript>Fcγ</subscript> good specificity, but it was at risk of false-negative results.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-1459
- Volume :
- 267
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of neurology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32623596
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10024-0