Back to Search Start Over

Provider visual attention on a respiratory function monitor during neonatal resuscitation.

Authors :
Herrick H
Weinberg D
Cecarelli C
Fishman CE
Newman H
den Boer MC
Martherus T
Katz TA
Nadkarni V
Te Pas AB
Foglia EE
Source :
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition [Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed] 2020 Nov; Vol. 105 (6), pp. 666-668. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 02.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: A respiratory function monitor (RFM) provides real-time positive pressure ventilation feedback. Whether providers use RFM during neonatal resuscitation is unknown.<br />Methods: Ancillary study to the MONITOR(NCT03256578) randomised controlled trial. Neonatal resuscitation leaders at two centres wore eye-tracking glasses, and visual attention (VA) patterns were compared between RFM-visible and RFM-masked groups.<br />Results: 14 resuscitations (6 RFM-visible, 8 RFM-masked) were analysed. The median total gaze duration on the RFM was significantly higher with a visible RFM (29% vs 1%, p<0.01), while median total gaze duration on other physical objects was significantly lower with a visible RFM (3% vs 8%, p=0.02). Median total gaze duration on the infant was lower with RFM visible, although not statistically significantly (29% vs 46%, p=0.05).<br />Conclusion: Providers' VA patterns differed during neonatal resuscitation when the RFM was visible, emphasising the importance of studying the impact of additional delivery room technology on providers' behaviour.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2052
Volume :
105
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32616559
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319291