Back to Search Start Over

The Table of Standard Atomic Weights-An exercise in consensus.

Authors :
Coplen TB
Holden NE
Ding T
Meijer HAJ
Vogl J
Zhu X
Source :
Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM [Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom] 2022 Aug 15; Vol. 36 (15), pp. e8864.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The present Table of Standard Atomic Weights (TSAW) of the elements is perhaps one of the most familiar data sets in science. Unlike most parameters in physical science whose values and uncertainties are evaluated using the "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement" (GUM), the majority of standard atomic-weight values and their uncertainties are consensus values, not GUM-evaluated values. The Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) regularly evaluates the literature for new isotopic-abundance measurements that can lead to revised standard atomic-weight values, A <subscript>r</subscript> °(E) for element E. The Commission strives to provide utmost clarity in products it disseminates, namely the TSAW and the Table of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements (TICE). In 2016, the Commission recognized that a guideline recommending the expression of uncertainty listed in parentheses following the standard atomic-weight value, for example, A <subscript>r</subscript> °(Se) = 78.971(8), did not agree with the GUM, which suggests that this parenthetic notation be reserved to express standard uncertainty, not the expanded uncertainty used in the TSAW and TICE. In 2017, to eliminate this noncompliance with the GUM, a new format was adopted in which the uncertainty value is specified by the "±" symbol, for example, A <subscript>r</subscript> °(Se) = 78.971 ± 0.008. To clarify the definition of uncertainty, a new footnote has been added to the TSAW. This footnote emphasizes that an atomic-weight uncertainty is a consensus (decisional) uncertainty. Not only has the Commission shielded users of the TSAW and TICE from unreliable measurements that appear in the literature as a result of unduly small uncertainties, but the aim of IUPAC has been fulfilled by which any scientist, taking any natural sample from commerce or research, can expect the sample atomic weight to lie within A <subscript>r</subscript> °(E) ± its uncertainty almost all of the time.<br /> (Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Subjects

Subjects :
Uncertainty
Consensus

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0231
Volume :
36
Issue :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32558968
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8864