Back to Search
Start Over
Long-term follow-up of the Shelhigh™ superstentless bioprosthesis aortic valve and valved conduit in a monocentric experience.
- Source :
-
The Journal of cardiovascular surgery [J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)] 2020 Dec; Vol. 61 (6), pp. 776-783. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 19. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The Shelhigh™ SuperStentless (Shelhigh, INC., Union, NJ, USA) is a stentless aortic valve bioprosthesis and aortic root valved conduit. In 2007, this device was recalled by FDA due to malfunction, and subsequently reintegrated by BioIntegral Surgical™ Few data are available over late durability of this device. We performed a long-term follow-up of Shelhigh™ devices implanted at our center.<br />Methods: Between 2002 and 2007, 44 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a Shelhigh™ device (40 aortic valve bioprosthesis and 4 valved conduit). We performed a clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (9.2 years±4.3). Standardized definitions of valve-related events were adopted.<br />Results: At discharge, maximum and mean aortic gradients averaged 36.1±11.3 and 21.0±6.8 mmHg, respectively. The 30-days mortality was 2.3%. Over the follow-up period, 29 patients died (65.9%); 2 deaths were valve related. Overall survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 97.7%, 85.8% and 54% respectively. At last echocardiography, average transvalvular gradients had remained globally stable in the population (33.6±12 and 20.4±10.5 mmHg). Eight (19%) structural valve deterioration (SVD) events were reported. Two (5%) non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD) events occurred (periprosthetic leak). Two (5%) infectious endocarditis events and two (5%) valve thromboses were also deplored. Three (7%) patients required re-operation (2 due to SVD and 1 due to endocarditis).<br />Conclusions: The immediate hemodynamic performance of the Shelhigh™ aortic bioprostheses was unexpectedly suboptimal. Despite this, hemodynamic performance remained stable over time. Patients survival at follow-up was satisfactory, however, continued surveillance is necessary.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Insufficiency physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology
Databases, Factual
Female
France
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Bioprosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1827-191X
- Volume :
- 61
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of cardiovascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32558524
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11219-9