Back to Search Start Over

Blood transfusion safety in the country of Georgia: collateral benefit from a national hepatitis C elimination program.

Authors :
Bloch EM
Kipiani E
Shadaker S
Alkhazashvili M
Gvinjilia L
Kuchuloria T
Chitadze N
Keating SM
Gamkrelidze A
Turdziladze A
Getia V
Nasrullah M
Averhoff F
Izoria M
Skaggs B
Source :
Transfusion [Transfusion] 2020 Jun; Vol. 60 (6), pp. 1243-1252. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 04.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: In April 2015, the government of Georgia (country) initiated the world's first national hepatitis C elimination program. An analysis of blood donor infectious screening data was conducted to inform a strategic plan to advance blood transfusion safety in Georgia.<br />Study Design and Methods: Descriptive analysis of blood donation records (2015-2017) was performed to elucidate differences in demographics, donor type, remuneration status, and seroprevalence for infectious markers (hepatitis C virus antibody [anti-HCV], human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HBsAg], and Treponema pallidum). For regression analysis, final models included all variables associated with the outcome in bivariate analysis (chi-square) with a p value of less than 0.05.<br />Results: During 2015 to 2017, there were 251,428 donations in Georgia, representing 112,093 unique donors; 68.5% were from male donors, and 51.2% of donors were paid or replacement (friends or family of intended recipient). The overall seroprevalence significantly declined from 2015 to 2017 for anti-HCV (2.3%-1.4%), HBsAg (1.5%-1.1%), and T. pallidum (1.1%-0.7%) [pā€‰<ā€‰0.0001]; the decline was not significant for HIV (0.2%-0.1%). Only 41.0% of anti-HCV seropositive donors underwent additional testing to confirm viremia. Infectious marker seroprevalence varied by age, sex, and geography. In multivariable analysis, first-time and paid donor status were associated with seropositivity for all four infectious markers.<br />Conclusion: A decline during the study period in infectious markers suggests improvement in blood safety in Georgia. Areas that need further improvement are donor recruitment, standardization of screening and diagnostic follow-up, quality assurance, and posttransfusion surveillance.<br /> (© 2020 AABB.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-2995
Volume :
60
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32542715
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15815