Genome-wide data reveal discordant mitonuclear introgression in the intermediate horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus affinis).

Closely related taxa often exhibit mitonuclear discordance attributed to introgression of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), yet few studies have considered the underlying causes of mtDNA introgression. Here we test for demographic versus adaptive processes as explanations for mtDNA introgression in three subspecies of the intermediate horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus affinis). We generated sequences of 1692 nuclear genes and 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes for 48 individuals. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on 320 exon sequences and 2217 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) both revealed conflicts between the species tree and mtDNA tree. These results, together with geographic patterns of mitonuclear discordance, and shared identical or near-identical mtDNA sequences, suggest extensive introgression of mtDNA between the two parapatric mainland subspecies. Under demographic hypotheses, we would also expect to uncover traces of ncDNA introgression, however, population structure and gene flow analyses revealed little nuclear admixture. Furthermore, we found inconsistent estimates of the timing of population expansion and that of the most recent common ancestor for the clade containing introgressed haplotypes. Without a clear demographic explanation, we also examined whether introgression likely arises from adaptation. We found that five mtDNA genes contained fixed amino acid differences between introgressed and non-introgressed individuals, including putative positive selection found in one codon, although this did not show introgression. While our evidence for rejecting demographic hypotheses is arguably stronger than that for rejecting adaptation, we find no definitive support for either explanation. Future efforts will focus on larger-scale resequencing to decipher the underlying causes of discordant mitonuclear introgression in this system.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)