Back to Search Start Over

No evidence of homeostatic regulation of leaf temperature in Eucalyptus parramattensis trees: integration of CO 2 flux and oxygen isotope methodologies.

Authors :
Drake JE
Harwood R
Vårhammar A
Barbour MM
Reich PB
Barton CVM
Tjoelker MG
Source :
The New phytologist [New Phytol] 2020 Dec; Vol. 228 (5), pp. 1511-1523. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 20.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Thermoregulation of leaf temperature (T <subscript>leaf</subscript> ) may foster metabolic homeostasis in plants, but the degree to which T <subscript>leaf</subscript> is moderated, and under what environmental contexts, is a topic of debate. Isotopic studies inferred the temperature of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to be a constant value of c. 20°C; by contrast, leaf biophysical theory suggests a strong dependence of T <subscript>leaf</subscript> on environmental drivers. Can this apparent disparity be reconciled? We continuously measured T <subscript>leaf</subscript> and whole-crown net CO <subscript>2</subscript> uptake for Eucalyptus parramattensis trees growing in field conditions in whole-tree chambers under ambient and +3°C warming conditions, and calculated assimilation-weighted leaf temperature (T <subscript>L-AW</subscript> ) across 265 d, varying in air temperature (T <subscript>air</subscript> ) from -1 to 45°C. We compared these data to T <subscript>L-AW</subscript> derived from wood cellulose δ <superscript>18</superscript> O. T <subscript>leaf</subscript> exhibited substantial variation driven by T <subscript>air</subscript> , light intensity, and vapor pressure deficit, and T <subscript>leaf</subscript> was strongly linearly correlated with T <subscript>air</subscript> with a slope of c. 1.0. T <subscript>L-AW</subscript> values calculated from cellulose δ <superscript>18</superscript> O vs crown fluxes were remarkably consistent; both varied seasonally and in response to the warming treatment, tracking variation in T <subscript>air</subscript> . The leaves studied here were nearly poikilothermic, with no evidence of thermoregulation of T <subscript>leaf</subscript> towards a homeostatic value. Importantly, this work supports the use of cellulose δ <superscript>18</superscript> O to infer T <subscript>L-AW</subscript> , but does not support the concept of strong homeothermic regulation of T <subscript>leaf</subscript> .<br /> (© 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Foundation.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1469-8137
Volume :
228
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New phytologist
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32531796
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16733