Back to Search Start Over

Prediction model of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: BEST-J score.

Authors :
Hatta W
Tsuji Y
Yoshio T
Kakushima N
Hoteya S
Doyama H
Nagami Y
Hikichi T
Kobayashi M
Morita Y
Sumiyoshi T
Iguchi M
Tomida H
Inoue T
Koike T
Mikami T
Hasatani K
Nishikawa J
Matsumura T
Nebiki H
Nakamatsu D
Ohnita K
Suzuki H
Ueyama H
Hayashi Y
Sugimoto M
Yamaguchi S
Michida T
Yada T
Asahina Y
Narasaka T
Kuribasyashi S
Kiyotoki S
Mabe K
Nakamura T
Nakaya N
Fujishiro M
Masamune A
Source :
Gut [Gut] 2021 Mar; Vol. 70 (3), pp. 476-484. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 04.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) is a frequent adverse event after ESD. We aimed to develop and externally validate a clinically useful prediction model (BEST-J score: Bleeding after ESD Trend from Japan) for bleeding after ESD for EGC.<br />Design: This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent ESD for EGC. Patients in the derivation cohort (n=8291) were recruited from 25 institutions, and patients in the external validation cohort (n=2029) were recruited from eight institutions in other areas. In the derivation cohort, weighted points were assigned to predictors of bleeding determined in the multivariate logistic regression analysis and a prediction model was established. External validation of the model was conducted to analyse discrimination and calibration.<br />Results: A prediction model comprised 10 variables (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant, chronic kidney disease with haemodialysis, P2Y12 receptor antagonist, aspirin, cilostazol, tumour size >30 mm, lower-third in tumour location, presence of multiple tumours and interruption of each kind of antithrombotic agents). The rates of bleeding after ESD at low-risk (0 to 1 points), intermediate-risk (2 points), high-risk (3 to 4 points) and very high-risk (≥5 points) were 2.8%, 6.1%, 11.4% and 29.7%, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the model showed moderately good discrimination, with a c -statistic of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.76), and good calibration (calibration-in-the-large, 0.05; calibration slope, 1.01).<br />Conclusions: In this nationwide multicentre study, we derived and externally validated a prediction model for bleeding after ESD. This model may be a good clinical decision-making support tool for ESD in patients with EGC.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: MF declared that he received lecture honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Nihon Pharmaceutical and his department received research grants from HOYA Pentax, EA Pharma, Eisai, Taiho Phamaceutical, AbbVie GK, Nippon Kayaku, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Gilead Sciences, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma outside the submitted work.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-3288
Volume :
70
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gut
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32499390
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319926