Back to Search
Start Over
Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report.
- Source :
-
European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society [Eur Respir Rev] 2020 Jun 03; Vol. 29 (156). Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 03 (Print Publication: 2020). - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient's medical management.The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a "state-of-the-art" review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Bonini has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Di Paolo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Bagnasco has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Baiardini has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Braido has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Caminati has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Carpagnano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Contoli reports grants from Chiesi, personal fees from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Menarini, Mundipharma, Almirall and Zambon, and grants from University of Ferrara (Italy), outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Corsico has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Del Giacco has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Heffler has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Lombardi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Menichini has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Milanese has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Scichilone has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Senna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.W. Canonica has nothing to disclose.<br /> (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)
- Subjects :
- Asthma diagnosis
Asthma metabolism
Asthma physiopathology
Biomarkers metabolism
Consensus
Delphi Technique
Endpoint Determination
Humans
Lung metabolism
Lung physiopathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Symptom Assessment
Treatment Outcome
Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use
Asthma drug therapy
Bronchoconstriction drug effects
Inflammation Mediators metabolism
Lung drug effects
Minimal Clinically Important Difference
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1600-0617
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 156
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32499305
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0137-2019