Back to Search
Start Over
Combination of diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling at 3.0 T for the clinical staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
- Source :
-
Clinical imaging [Clin Imaging] 2020 Oct; Vol. 66, pp. 127-132. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 15. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To probe the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and 3D arterial spin labeling (ASL) in assessing the clinical stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).<br />Materials and Methods: This prospective study included sixty-five newly diagnosed NPC patients who underwent DWI and 3D ASL scans on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the tumor blood flow (TBF) of NPC were measured. Tumors were classified as low or high T, N and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the differences between tumors with low and high clinical stages. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to determine the correlation between MRI parameters and clinical stages. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used to evaluate diagnostic capability.<br />Results: High T stage (T3/4) NPC showed significantly lower ADC <subscript>min</subscript> (P = 0.000) and higher TBF <subscript>max</subscript> (P = 0.003) and TBF <subscript>mean</subscript> (P = 0.008) values than low T stage (T1/2) NPC. High N stage (N2/3) NPC showed significantly lower ADC <subscript>min</subscript> values (P = 0.023) than low N stage (N0/1) NPC. High AJCC stage (III/IV) NPC showed significantly lower ADC <subscript>min</subscript> (P = 0.000) and higher TBF <subscript>max</subscript> (P = 0.005) and TBF <subscript>mean</subscript> (P = 0.011) values than low AJCC stage (I/II) NPC. ADC <subscript>min</subscript> values showed moderate negative correlations with T stage (r = -0.512, P = 0.000), N stage (r = -0.281, P = 0.023), and AJCC stage (r = -0.494, P = 0.000). TBF <subscript>max</subscript> values showed moderate positive correlations with T stage (r = 0.369, P = 0.003) and AJCC stage (r = 0.346, P = 0.005). Compared with ADC <subscript>min</subscript> and TBF <subscript>max</subscript> alone, the combination of ADC <subscript>min</subscript> and TBF <subscript>max</subscript> improved the accuracy from 72.3% and 75.4% to 78.5%, respectively, for T staging, as well as from 72.3% and 69.2% to 83.1% for AJCC staging.<br />Conclusions: ADC <subscript>min</subscript> and TBF <subscript>max</subscript> values in patients with NPC could help evaluate clinical stages. ADC <subscript>min</subscript> and TBF <subscript>max</subscript> values combined could clearly improve the accuracy in the assessment of AJCC stage.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this work.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms pathology
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Spin Labels
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma diagnostic imaging
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Staging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-4499
- Volume :
- 66
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical imaging
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32480267
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.05.007