Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
- Source :
-
The British journal of radiology [Br J Radiol] 2020 Aug; Vol. 93 (1112), pp. 20200298. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 11. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objective: To compare the performance of Likert and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) multiparametric (mp) MRI scoring systems for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).<br />Methods: 199 biopsy-naïve males undergoing prostate mpMRI were prospectively scored with Likert and PI-RADS systems by four experienced radiologists. A binary cut-off (threshold score ≥3) was used to analyze histological results by three groups: negative, insignificant disease (Gleason 3 + 3; iPCa), and csPCa (Gleason ≥3 +4). Lesion-level results and prostate zonal location were also compared.<br />Results: 129/199 (64.8%) males underwent biopsy, 96 with Likert or PI-RADS score ≥3, and 21 with negative MRI. A further 12 patients were biopsied during follow-up (mean 507 days). Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 87/199 (43.7%) patients, 65 with (33.6%) csPCa. 30/92 (32.6%) patients with negative MRI were biopsied, with an NPV of 83.3% for cancer and 86.7% for csPCa. Likert and PI-RADS score differences were observed in 92 patients (46.2%), but only for 16 patients (8%) at threshold score ≥3. Likert scoring had higher specificity than PI-RADS (0.77 vs 0.66), higher area under the curve (0.92 vs 0.87, p = 0.002) and higher PPV (0.66 vs 0.58); NPV and sensitivity were the same. Likert had more five score results (58%) compared to PI-RADS (36%), but with similar csCPa detection (81.0 and 80.6% respectively). Likert demonstrated lower proportion of false positive in the predominately AFMS-involving lesions.<br />Conclusion: Likert and PI-RADS systems both demonstrate high cancer detection rates. Likert scoring had a higher AUC with moderately higher specificity and lower positive call rate and could potentially help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies performed.<br />Advances in Knowledge: This paper illustrates that the Likert scoring system has potential to help urologists reduce the number of prostate biopsies performed.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prostate diagnostic imaging
Prostate pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1748-880X
- Volume :
- 93
- Issue :
- 1112
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The British journal of radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32479105
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200298