Back to Search
Start Over
Systematic symptom and problem assessment at admission to the palliative care ward - perspectives and prognostic impacts.
- Source :
-
BMC palliative care [BMC Palliat Care] 2020 May 28; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 75. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 28. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Symptom assessment is essential in palliative care, but holds challenges concerning implementation and relevance. This study aims to evaluate patients' main symptoms and problems at admission to a specialist inpatient palliative care (SIPC) ward using physician proxy- and patient self-assessment, and aims to identify their prognostic impact as well as the agreement between both assessments.<br />Methods: Within 12 h after admission, palliative care specialists completed the Symptom and Problem Checklist of the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE-SP-CL). Patients either used the new version of the minimal documentation system for patients in palliative care (MIDOS) or the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) plus the Distress Thermometer (DT).<br />Results: Between 01.01.2016-30.09.2018, 1206 patients were included (HOPE-SP-CL 98%; MIDOS 21%, IPOS 34%, DT 27%) whereof 59% died on the ward. Proxy-assessment showed a mean HOPE-SP-CL Total Score of 24.6 ± 5.9 of 45. Most frequent symptoms/problems of at least moderate intensity were weakness (95%), needs of assistance with activities of daily living (88%), overburdening of family caregivers (83%), and tiredness (75%). Factor analysis identified four symptom clusters (SCs): (1) Deteriorated Physical Condition/Decompensation of Home Care, (2) Emotional Problems, (3) Gastrointestinal Symptoms and (4) Other Symptoms. Self-assessment showed a mean MIDOS Total Score of 11.3 ± 5.3 of 30, a mean IPOS Total Score of 32.0 ± 9.0 of 68, and a mean distress of 6.6 ± 2.5 of 10. Agreement of self- and proxy-assessment was moderate for pain (ƙ = 0.438) and dyspnea (ƙ = 0.503), fair for other physical (ƙ = 0.297 to 0.394) and poor for psychological symptoms (ƙ = 0.101 to 0.202). Multivariate regression analyses for single symptoms and SCs revealed that predictors for dying on the SIPC ward included impaired ECOG performance status, moderate/severe dyspnea, appetite loss, tiredness, disorientation/confusion, and the SC Deteriorated Physical Condition/Decompensation of Home Care.<br />Conclusion: Admissions to a SIPC ward are mainly caused by problems impairing mobility and autonomy. Results demonstrate that implementation of self- and reliability of proxy- and self-assessment is challenging, especially concerning non-physical symptoms/problems. We identified, specific symptoms and problems that might provide information needed for treatment discussions regarding the medical prognosis.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Germany
Hospitals, University organization & administration
Hospitals, University statistics & numerical data
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Palliative Care standards
Patient Admission trends
Patients' Rooms organization & administration
Prognosis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Syndrome
Triage standards
Triage trends
Palliative Care organization & administration
Patient Admission standards
Triage methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1472-684X
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC palliative care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32466759
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00576-3