Back to Search
Start Over
Prioritisation of ICU treatments for critically ill patients in a COVID-19 pandemic with scarce resources.
- Source :
-
Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine [Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med] 2020 Jun; Vol. 39 (3), pp. 333-339. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 17. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Relying on capacity increases and patient transfers to deal with the huge and continuous inflow of COVID-19 critically ill patients is a strategy limited by finite human and logistical resources.<br />Rationale: Prioritising both critical care initiation and continuation is paramount to save the greatest number of lives. It enables to allocate scarce resources in priority to those with the highest probability of benefiting from them. It is fully ethical provided it relies on objective and widely shared criteria, thus preventing arbitrary decisions and guaranteeing equity. Prioritisation seeks to fairly allocate treatments, maximise saved lives, gain indirect life benefits from prioritising exposed healthcare and similar workers, give priority to those most penalised as a last resort, and apply similar prioritisation schemes to all patients.<br />Prioritisation Strategy: Prioritisation schemes and their criteria are adjusted to the level of resource scarcity: strain (level A) or saturation (level B). Prioritisation yields a four level priority for initiation or continuation of critical care: P1-high priority, P2-intermediate priority, P3-not needed, P4-not appropriate. Prioritisation schemes take into account the patient's wishes, clinical frailty, pre-existing chronic condition, along with severity and evolution of acute condition. Initial priority level must be reassessed, at least after 48h once missing decision elements are available, at the typical turning point in the disease's natural history (ICU days 7 to 10 for COVID-19), and each time resource scarcity levels change. For treatments to be withheld or withdrawn, a collegial decision-making process and information of patient and/or next of kin are paramount.<br />Perspective: Prioritisation strategy is bound to evolve with new knowledge and with changes within the epidemiological situation.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- COVID-19
Canada
Caregivers
Continuity of Patient Care organization & administration
Coronavirus Infections epidemiology
Critical Care ethics
Critical Care standards
France epidemiology
Health Personnel
Health Priorities ethics
Health Services Accessibility ethics
Humans
Intensive Care Units supply & distribution
Patient Transfer
Pneumonia, Viral epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Refusal to Treat ethics
Resource Allocation ethics
SARS-CoV-2
Social Justice
Switzerland
Triage ethics
Triage organization & administration
Betacoronavirus
Coronavirus Infections therapy
Critical Care organization & administration
Critical Illness
Health Priorities standards
Health Resources supply & distribution
Intensive Care Units organization & administration
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral therapy
Triage standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2352-5568
- Volume :
- 39
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32426441
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.008