Back to Search Start Over

Air quality changes during the COVID-19 lockdown over the Yangtze River Delta Region: An insight into the impact of human activity pattern changes on air pollution variation.

Authors :
Li L
Li Q
Huang L
Wang Q
Zhu A
Xu J
Liu Z
Li H
Shi L
Li R
Azari M
Wang Y
Zhang X
Liu Z
Zhu Y
Zhang K
Xue S
Ooi MCG
Zhang D
Chan A
Source :
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2020 Aug 25; Vol. 732, pp. 139282. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 11.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 has spreaded rapidly across the world. To control the rapid dispersion of the virus, China has imposed national lockdown policies to practise social distancing. This has led to reduced human activities and hence primary air pollutant emissions, which caused improvement of air quality as a side-product. To investigate the air quality changes during the COVID-19 lockdown over the YRD Region, we apply the WRF-CAMx modelling system together with monitoring data to investigate the impact of human activity pattern changes on air quality. Results show that human activities were lowered significantly during the period: industrial operations, VKT, constructions in operation, etc. were significantly reduced, leading to lowered SO <subscript>2</subscript> , NO <subscript>x</subscript> , PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> and VOCs emissions by approximately 16-26%, 29-47%, 27-46% and 37-57% during the Level I and Level II response periods respectively. These emission reduction has played a significant role in the improvement of air quality. Concentrations of PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> , NO <subscript>2</subscript> and SO <subscript>2</subscript> decreased by 31.8%, 45.1% and 20.4% during the Level I period; and 33.2%, 27.2% and 7.6% during the Level II period compared with 2019. However, ozone did not show any reduction and increased greatly. Our results also show that even during the lockdown, with primary emissions reduction of 15%-61%, the daily average PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> concentrations range between 15 and 79 μg m <superscript>-3</superscript> , which shows that background and residual pollutions are still high. Source apportionment results indicate that the residual pollution of PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> comes from industry (32.2-61.1%), mobile (3.9-8.1%), dust (2.6-7.7%), residential sources (2.1-28.5%) in YRD and 14.0-28.6% contribution from long-range transport coming from northern China. This indicates that in spite of the extreme reductions in primary emissions, it cannot fully tackle the current air pollution. Re-organisation of the energy and industrial strategy together with trans-regional joint-control for a full long-term air pollution plan need to be further taken into account.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1026
Volume :
732
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Science of the total environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32413621
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139282