Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong.
- Source :
-
Digestive diseases and sciences [Dig Dis Sci] 2021 Apr; Vol. 66 (4), pp. 1315-1326. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 08. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are entering the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in Hong Kong, prompting the need for cost-effectiveness evaluations of these interventions to enable optimal use of healthcare resources.<br />Aims: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of DAAs to standard-of-care pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients without significant liver fibrosis and to compare different DAAs in patients who are treatment-experienced and/or have advanced liver disease.<br />Methods: A Markov model was constructed to evaluate cost-effectiveness over a lifetime time horizon from the payer perspective. The target population was treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients, stratified by degree of liver fibrosis. The model consists of 16 health states encompassing METAVIR fibrosis score (F0-F4), treatment success or failure, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and liver-related death. The proportions of patients achieving sustained virologic response were obtained from clinical trials. Other inputs were obtained from published and local data. The primary outcome was incremental cost-utility ratio for each DAA versus pegylated interferon + ribavirin and among different DAAs.<br />Results: In treatment-naïve F0-2 HCV patients, all DAAs were cost-effective in genotype 1a and daclatasvir + asunaprevir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were cost-effective compared to pegylated interferon + ribavirin in genotype 1b. In genotypes 1a and 1b, treatment-experienced patients, and F3-4 patients, elbasvir/grazoprevir was the least costly DAA and economically dominant over most other DAAs.<br />Conclusions: DAAs can be a cost-effective option for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV patients in Hong Kong, and elbasvir/grazoprevir is cost-effective.
- Subjects :
- Administration, Oral
Adult
Antiviral Agents administration & dosage
Cohort Studies
Female
Hepacivirus genetics
Hepatitis C, Chronic epidemiology
Hepatitis C, Chronic genetics
Hong Kong epidemiology
Humans
Male
Markov Chains
Middle Aged
Treatment Outcome
Antiviral Agents economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis methods
Genotype
Hepacivirus drug effects
Hepatitis C, Chronic drug therapy
Hepatitis C, Chronic economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1573-2568
- Volume :
- 66
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Digestive diseases and sciences
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32385703
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06281-8