Back to Search Start Over

Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors :
Gowin K
Ballen K
Ahn KW
Hu ZH
Ali H
Arcasoy MO
Devlin R
Coakley M
Gerds AT
Green M
Gupta V
Hobbs G
Jain T
Kandarpa M
Komrokji R
Kuykendall AT
Luber K
Masarova L
Michaelis LC
Patches S
Pariser AC
Rampal R
Stein B
Talpaz M
Verstovsek S
Wadleigh M
Agrawal V
Aljurf M
Angel Diaz M
Avalos BR
Bacher U
Bashey A
Beitinjaneh AM
Cerny J
Chhabra S
Copelan E
Cutler CS
DeFilipp Z
Gadalla SM
Ganguly S
Grunwald MR
Hashmi SK
Kharfan-Dabaja MA
Kindwall-Keller T
Kröger N
Lazarus HM
Liesveld JL
Litzow MR
Marks DI
Nathan S
Nishihori T
Olsson RF
Pawarode A
Rowe JM
Savani BN
Savoie ML
Seo S
Solh M
Tamari R
Verdonck LF
Yared JA
Alyea E
Popat U
Sobecks R
Scott BL
Nakamura R
Mesa R
Saber W
Source :
Blood advances [Blood Adv] 2020 May 12; Vol. 4 (9), pp. 1965-1973.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.<br /> (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2473-9537
Volume :
4
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood advances
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32384540
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001084