Back to Search Start Over

Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: An opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium.

Authors :
Johannesson L
Testa G
Flyckt R
Farrell R
Quintini C
Wall A
O'Neill K
Tzakis A
Richards EG
Gordon SM
Porrett PM
Source :
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons [Am J Transplant] 2020 Dec; Vol. 20 (12), pp. 3319-3325. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 22.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Uterus transplantation is a nascent but growing field. To support this growth, the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium proposes guidelines for nomenclature related to operative technique, vascular anatomy, and donor, recipient, and offspring outcomes. In terms of anatomy, the group recommends reporting donor arterial inflow and recipient anastomotic site delivering inflow to the graft and offers standardization of the names for the 4 veins originating from the uterus because of current inconsistency in this particular nomenclature. Seven progressive stages with milestones of success are defined for reporting on uterus transplantation outcomes: (1) technical, (2) menstruation, (3) embryo implantation, (4) pregnancy, (5) delivery, (6) graft removal, and (7) long-term follow-up. The 3 primary metrics for success are recipient survival (as reported for other organ transplant recipients), graft survival, and uterus transplant live birth rate (defined as live birth per transplanted recipient). A number of secondary outcomes should also be reported, most of which capture stage-specific milestones, as well as data on graft failure. Outcome metrics for living donors include patient survival, survival free of operative intervention, and data on complications and hospitalizations. Finally, we make specific recommendations on follow-up for offspring born from uterine grafts, which includes specialty surveillance as well as collection and reporting of routine pediatric outcomes. The goal of standardization in reporting is to create consistency and improve the quality of evidence available on the efficacy and value of the procedure.<br /> (© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1600-6143
Volume :
20
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32379930
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15973